MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6907150319 · doi:10.20381/ruor-30699

Analysis of Complex Dynamical Systems by Combining Recurrent Neural Networks and Mechanistic Models

2024· dissertation· en· W6907150319 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa - Library · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkRecurrent neural networkTime seriesDynamical systems theoryHybrid systemDynamical system (definition)Memory modelPreprocessor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study is to analyze the time series data in an innovative manner, which combined the deep learning model with the mechanistic model to form a hybrid model. In order to demonstrate the feasibility and theoretical background of the hybrid model, the Lorenz System is used as an example to explore the underlying mathematical mechanism. Through several simple exams, it is observed that the Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory (BDLSTM) in the hybrid model could be trained to learn the dynamical behavior of the complex dynamical system properly and the mechanistic model in the hybrid model could adapt to different situations flexibly. In practical exploration, a real hybrid model, namely the Argiculture-informed Neural Network (AINN) model, that consists of deep neural networks (DNN), including but not limited to: Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) , Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Transformer, and Dynamic Land Ecosystem Model (DLEM), are proposed to predict nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural fields. The model is trained using data collected from smart farm, named Area X.O, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, during the 2021 growing season and tested using data from the 2022 growing season. During the data preprocessing stage, we utilized the Robust Scaler (or MinMax Scaler) to scale the data into a narrow range. Our statistical analysis revealed that temperature and humidity are closely related and share similar time series patterns, suggesting that they contain the same information for predicting nitrous oxide (N$_2$O) emissions. To evaluate the model's performance, several metrics were used, including mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R$^2$). Our results indicate that the AINN outperforms the pure DNN and DLEM in both the training and testing datasets, because in the hybrid model, the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) part could catch the dynamical behavior of the emission of N$_2$O, and the DLEM part could regulate the training path and lead the entire model to converge in a limited number of basins of attraction. Additionally, since it is costly to collected the data from the field, it is better for us to do time series data augmentation using Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), with the aim of closely matching the original data distribution while also preserving the dynamic behavior of the original data. However, even state-of-the-art GAN models like TimeGAN fall short in preserving the temporal dynamics present in the original time series due to the absence of first-order difference information. To address this limitation, this study proposes a novel process for generating multivariate time series data. The proposed process comprises four essential modules: a) the GAN module for generating multivariate time series data, b) the sampling module for preserving the first-order difference distribution, c) the smoothing module for refining the generated data, and d) an evaluation module using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test (KS-test) and Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), along with other metrics to test the synthetic time series data. This comprehensive approach ensures that the synthetic time series data maintains both the distribution and the dynamic behavior of the original data. With the advent of quantum computing, we transitioned from the conventional LSTM to quantum LSTM and formulated the Quantum Long Short Term Memory-Dynamical Land Ecosystem Model (QLSTM-DLEM) model, showcasing enhanced generalization capability and stability. Experimental results indicated that QLSTM-DLEM achieved comparable performance to Long Short Term Memory-Dynamical Land Ecosystem Model (LSTM-DLEM) using several quantum bits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa - LibrarySame topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207