Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A set of metapopulation models to analyse the population dynamics of an horizontally transmitted symbiont. Authors of the model code Alexandre Mestre, Michael Barfield, James H. Peniston, and Robert D. Holt These models were used to conduct theoretical research on dispersal evolution in a horizontally transmitted symbiont. The results from this research were presented in a talk at the 2018 ESA Annual Meeting held in New Orleans, Louisiana: Mestre A (1), Barfield M (2), Peniston JM (2), Peres-Neto PR (1), Mesquita-Joanes F (3) and Holt RD (2). Tolerance benefit of dispersal when metapopulation conditions become extreme. (1) Department of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada (2) Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (3) Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia symet v. 1.0.0 is the first released version of the code. GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 3, 29 June 2007 Background/Question/Methods Dispersal is an essential process in metapopulation dynamics, especially when local disturbance affects the likelihood of local population persistence. Optimal dispersal rates are the ones that maximize metapopulation persistence. In general, metapopulation models support the presence of a trade-off mechanism in which the optimal dispersal rate increases when intra-patch carrying capacity decreases, and it decreases with increasing mortality during dispersal (often called "cost of dispersal"). However, under extreme intra- and off-patch conditions, a further harshening of the dispersal environment produces a counterintuitive increase in optimal dispersal rates. This study aims at exploring metapopulation dispersal dynamics under extreme conditions in detail, by answering the following questions: i) What are the benefits of dispersal when (intra- and off-patch) environmental conditions become extreme? ii) What is the effect of disturbance intensity on the patterns of optimal dispersal strategies under these conditions? iii) What happens to the optimal dispersal rate of individuals that invade empty metapopulations undergoing extreme conditions? We used a spatially-implicit model in which ten clones varying in dispersal rates compete to persist in a metapopulation undergoing local disturbance. The model combined deterministic intra-patch dynamics with logistic, density-dependent growth, and emigration, coupled by stochastic transience among patches mediated by the dispersal environment. Results/Conclusions We confirm that, in a competitive environment with extreme metapopulation conditions, a further increase in both intra- and off-patch harshness leads to higher values of optimal dispersal rate. We also identified an abundance-occupancy trade-off in dispersal between maximizing intra-patch abundance (lower dispersal) and occupancy (higher dispersal), which is conceptually similar to the dominance-tolerance trade-off known for specialist-generalist strategies. In par with this trade-off, we found that dispersal expands the tolerance limits to intra- and off-patch harshness. We also demonstrate that dispersal modifies the optimal environmental conditions in which clones outcompete each other. In addition, disturbance intensity reduces the range of intra- and off-patch environmental conditions that allow for species persistence, intensifying the effects of environmental harshness on optimal dispersal rates. Invasion conditions release higher-dispersal clones with suboptimal dispersal strategies from competitive exclusion, as a result of stochastic loss of stronger competitors at the initial invasion phase. We predict that the tolerance benefits of dispersal will be especially relevant in sink metapopulations where conditions are, by definition, more extreme, and the success of evolutionary rescue for long-term persistence should depend on the details underlying dispersal dynamics. Description of the models The models apply metapopulation concepts to the dynamics of an horizontally transmitted symbiont inhabiting a population of hosts, where hosts are akin to ephemeral habitat patches that contain symbiont infrapopulations interconnected by dispersal, and patch disturbance represents host death. The repository symet contains four models: SYMDYN is a metapopulation model that simulates the dynamics of a symbiont inhabiting a host population. The model combines deterministic intra-patch dynamics with logistic, density-dependent growth, and emigration, coupled by stochastic transience among patches mediated by the dispersal environment. This model was used to determine whether a symbiont persists in a host population. We focused on the role of host quality and abundance, and the quality of off-host environment. In this model, within-host dynamics and emigration are mechanistic, whereas deaths of both hosts and dispersal symbionts, as well as symbiont colonisation events, are stochastic. SYMDYN_STOC is a fully stochastic version of SYMDYN SYMCOMP is a variant of SYMDYN where ten clones varying in dispersal rates compete to persist within the same population of hosts. This model was used to analyse patterns and drivers of symbiont dispersal selection. SYMCOMP_STOC is a fully stochastic version of SYMCOP General assumptions A symbiont population is the number of symbionts within a host. The symbiont has a direct cycle and can complete the cycle within the same host individual. Symbiont populations are density-dependent, with a carrying capacity governed by host quality. The symbiont has continuous generations. The symbiont has active transmission via an off-host environment with two steps: shedding + transmission. Shedding rates are a symbiont trait. Symbionts can be transmitted to both colonized and uncolonized hosts. Transmission rates depend on off-host symbiont mortality, the capacity of symbionts to move throughout the environment, and the number of hosts free of symbionts. Survival and displacement efficacy during transmission are governed by the quality of the off-host environment. Host population size remains constant over time. Host mortality is constant and independent of symbiont dynamics (i.e. commensal). When a host dies, symbionts can either be released to take part in the dispersal pool or die because the host was fed by a predator. Within-host dynamics and shedding will be mechanistic. Second-order Runge-Kutta algorithm will be used for calculations of population increase each time step. Host mortality will be stochastic. Colonisation will be stochastic. Variables N is the host population size. Nc is the number of colonized hosts. n0 is the initial symbiont population size for initially colonized hosts ne is the number of dispersal symbionts (i.e. living out of the hosts). M is the per day and per capita host mortality rate. P is the probability that a deed host was due to predation. r is the basic symbiont population growth (within a host). C is the density-dependent parameter of symbiont populations. s is the per day and per capita shedding rate. m is the per day and per capita mortality rate of dispersal symbionts. t is the per day and per capita transmission efficacy of dispersal symbionts. ni is the symbiont population size within the host "i" Prev is the percentage of colonized hosts. Ab is the mean symbiont population size of colonized hosts. VMR is the variance to mean ratio of symbiont population sizes of colonized hosts. T is the total number of days of the experiment. h is the duration of each running time step of the program. out_tfreq is the scaling parameter controlling the frequency of days shown in the output out_tinit is the shifting parameter controlling the initial day for the output Rep is the number of repetitions of each scenario N_Scen is the number of scenarios to be simulated Equations (SYMDYN variant) Eq. 1. Estimation of ni increase at each time step using Runge-Kutta algorithm method ni+1/2 = ni + [ ni ( r - C * ni ) - s * ni ] * ½ * h ni+1 = ni + [ ni+1/2 ( r - C * ni+1/2 ) - s * ni+1/2 ] * h Eq. 2. Calculation of prevalence (Prev) at each time step Prev = Nc / N Eq. 3. Calculation of mean abundance of colonized hosts (Ab) at each time step Ab = sum (symbiont population sizes) / Nc Pseudo-code (SYMDYN variant) (top-down stepwise refinement) Problem statement Determine whether a symbiont persists in a host population, depending on host quality and abundance, and the quality of the off-host environment. First refinement Initialize variables Simulate the symbiont dynamics along the experimental time Print temporal variation of symbiont population parameters Second refinement Initialize N to value // N is the host population size (that remains constant in all the experiments) Initialize Nc to value // Nc is the number of colonized hosts Initialize n0 to value // n0 is the initial symbiont population size for initially colonized hosts Initialize ne to value // ne is the number of dispersal symbionts Initialize M to value // M is the per day and per capita host mortality rate Initialize P to value // P is a per day and per capita predation rate on the host Initialize r to value // r is the basic symbiont population growth Initialize C to value // C is the density-dependent parameter of symbiont populations Initialize s to value // s is the per day and per capita shedding rate Initialize m to value // m is the per day and per capita mortality rate of dispersal symbionts Initialize t to value // t is the per day and per capita movement efficacy of dispersal symbionts Initialize T to value // T is the total number of days of the experiment Initialize h to value // h is the running time step of the program Set initial conditions of within-host populations For each time step (until experimental time finishes or prevalence gets 0) Calculate (deterministically) initial symbiont population sizes at the given step Host deaths and births Calculate the number of dispersal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.103 | 0.085 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it