MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912019994 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1443106

Автобусні Зупинки Радянської Доби: Феномен У Монументальному Мистецтві

2018· article· en· W6912019994 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSustainable Urban and Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)UkrainianEthnic groupPhenomenonPeriod (music)Cultural phenomenon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article studies bus stops as a specifi c phenomenon of the environmental art of the Soviet period. It examines the territory of the post-Soviet Union of the 1980s in general and certain regions in the Ukrainian SSR in particular. A comparative analysis of artistic and architectural qualities of bus shelters of different Republics of the USSR has been conducted. Particular examples of the decoration of Ivano-Frankivsk region bus shelters are taken into account in the context of their aesthetic, visual and cultural importance. Their stylistic features, techniques of execution and means of expressiveness are analyzed. The main thematic directions of compositions pertained to Ivano-Frankivsk region are highlighted and systematized. The specifi c color palette, typical ornamental motifs and their connection with the traditional decorative-applied art of the Precarpathian region have been estimated. Special attention has been given to professional artists who have worked on the creation of monumental works for bus shelters. The issue of the preservation and reconstruction of mosaic panels stops as art monuments of the region is becoming urgent. Target setting. Monumental art of bus shelters as a cultural heritage of the Soviet-era merits serious attention. It is conditioned by an objective necessity of its time, the desire to strengthen the content, the aesthetic signifi cance of the environment. Today it forms a part of the most alive traditions of the post-Soviet era. Particularly in Ukraine, art works of stops often serve as bearers of lyrical folklore images, progressive folk traditions, characteristics of ethnic heritage and artistic identity. Leading masters of the region worked on bus shelters of Ivano-Frankivsk region, giving them a special emotional colouring, plastic variety, the dynamics of rhythms, in harmony with the environment. However, in our time, the danger of their complete destruction especially raises the question of fi xing these monuments, their reconstruction and preservation. Urgency of the research. Mosaic compositions of bus shelters refer to the least studied works of the monumental art of Ivano-Frankivsk region and Ukraine in general. Many of them are lost, and a large part of it is in an advanced state of decay or is ruining. Thus, there is a need for a comprehensive artistic and stylistic, art analysis. Background. Despite the uniqueness of such a cultural phenomenon as the monumental art of bus shelters, its thorough historical and art research is missing. The only sources that partially describe the phenomenon of stops are the photo albums, which bear only an exclusively illustrative function. However, the public interest to the art of bus shelters is constantly growing. The kick-start for this process came from the outside, when the well-known Canadian photographer Christopher Herwig shared the results of his journey through the territories of the former Soviet republics and in 2014 presented the book “Soviet bus stops” to the world, where he directed attention to some bus shelters of Ukraine. A signifi cant step in the popularization of the monumental art works of the Soviet era was made by the Ukrainian photographer Eugene Nikiforov, through his photo-study published as the book “Decommunized: Ukrainian Soviet Mosaics”. The album contains about 200 unique photographs of monumental panels from 109 cities and villages of Ukraine, with the examples of bus shelters as well. A special symbolic meaning of the phenomenon of Ukrainian bus shelters was given by the designer Yana Chervinska and the artist Oleksandr Burlaka. It was them who set the bus stop as the cornerstone concept for their exposition booth at the largest international design exhibitions of the International Fashion Showcase in 2017, which was held under the motto of the global and local interconnection. Objectives. The purpose of the article is a comprehensive artistic and stylistic analysis of bus shelters of Ivano-Frankivsk region, identifi cation of the defi ning features, trends and vectors of the development of their fi gurative palette. Analyzing the bus shelters as artistic monuments of special cultural signifi cance of Ivano-Frankivsk region, we have faced the problem of their preservation. After all, most of the stops are in an abandoned condition and are destroying both through natural factors and by vandals and careless citizens. Many works of the monumental art, at the moment, can be considered as missing traces, and those which continue to decorate the walls of the bus shelters need professional restoration, renewal and upkeep. Increasingly, we see the initiatives of popular creative activity on decorating stops in the places where the works by professional monumental artists could be found. This process is especially evolving in the central regions of Ukraine, particularly, in Poltava and Zaporizhzhia regions. Conclusions. Consequently, the monumental art of bus shelters on the territory of the post-Soviet area is a phenomenon that is Харків 2018 2 розділ absolutely unique on a global scale. It carried a communicative, city-forming function, contributed to the humanization, theatricalization of the environment. Stops are objects that accumulated a powerful cultural code for a particular area, gave the environment vizualization, ideology, and relevance. The mosaics of bus shelters of Ivano-Frankivsk region were distinguished by their graphical expressivity, richness of color and form, individuality of themes. The works have a strong connection with the applied art of the region, its folkloric asset, high professionalism of performance and aesthetic completeness of images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSustainable Urban and Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207