MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6921801598 · doi:10.7939/r35k89

Assisted migration to address climate change: recommendations for reforestation in western Canada

2011· dissertation· en· W6921801598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReforestationClimate changeHabitatTaigaForest managementEcosystem servicesStock (firearms)Forest restorationTree planting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A changing climate is the largest threat to forest productivity in western Canada and to the ability of forested landscapes to provide ecological and economic services, both now and in the future. As climate changes, locally adapted tree populations become mismatched with local conditions, leading to mal-adaptation that may result in a reduction in forest health and productivity. This problem can be reduced with interventions that match reforestation stock to anticipated future environments. As such, there is a pressing need to inform such actions by carefully developing and contextualizing scientific information and by applying it to provincial reforestation policies. Assisted migration is a climate change adaptation strategy used in the forestry sector, where species and seed sources are moved to new locations. The goal of this thesis is to develop a methodological framework to guide assisted migration efforts for forest trees in western Canada, under a comprehensive range of future climate projections. To assist with these management needs I create a new ecosystem-based climate envelope modeling approach for 16 commercially important tree species. Habitat projections show populations already geographically lag behind their optimal climate and the magnitude of this lag is projected to double for the 2020s. The most pronounced habitat shifts are projected to occur in the boreal forests and the Rocky Mountains, predominately affecting black spruce, tamarack, white spruce and aspen populations. In a case study for Alberta, I find that genotypes of species that are adapted to drier climatic conditions will be the preferred planting stock over much of the commercially managed boreal forest. Interestingly, no alternate non-native species to Alberta that were examined in this study can be recommended with any confidence as planting stock. Finally, I observe high uncertainty in projections of suitable habitat for most species making reforestation planning beyond the 2050s difficult. Using genetic and remote sensing data for aspen populations, I show that habitat projections from climate envelope models under observed climate change conform well to empirical data on loss of aspen productivity and genetic data on sub-optimal growth due to mal-adaptation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it