MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6921811207 · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.07.013

Effect of human-driven, autonomous, and connected autonomous vehicles on geometric highway design

2025· article· en· W6921811207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlexandria Engineering Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeometric designRepresentation (politics)Constant (computer programming)Perspective (graphical)Vehicle dynamicsIntelligent transportation systemEfficient energy use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highway geometric design plays a crucial role in maintaining traffic safety and operational efficiency. The number of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) and Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) on highway networks has increased in recent years. In this study, a traffic model is developed from a spring-mass system theory perspective to investigate traffic dynamics on horizontal highway curves. The Intelligent Driver (ID) model is based on a constant exponent δ to characterize driver response, which is unrealistic. By utilizing a spring-mass system analogy, the proposed model provides a more accurate and realistic representation of traffic. This model is used to evaluate the behavior of Human-driven Vehicles (HVs), AVs, and CAVs over a 1300 m circular road. The results obtained show that CAVs have better performance compared to HVs and AVs on horizontal curves, leading to better understanding of safety and efficiency on roads. Further, CAVs improve energy efficiency and emission reduction, contributing to effective and sustainable transportation systems. In addition, the results indicate that the proposed model has better performance compared to the ID model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it