MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6922055106 · doi:10.11575/prism/48983

Understanding Housing Inequities through the Lens of Anti-Black Racism in Canada and their Implications for Refugee Mental Health.

2021· other· en· W6922055106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTechnology, Environment, Urban Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismMental healthRefugeeEquity (law)Service providerAgency (philosophy)Health equitySocial workPerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) has recognized that anti-Black racism is a significant determinant of mental health and well-being. While issues of housing and racism has been extensively discussed, the interactive effects of anti-Black racism, housing and mental health have not called enough attention. Methods: We used Group Concept Mapping methods to bring together a total of 174 stakeholders including community leaders, volunteers, and service providers to synthesize ideas of actions that need to be taken to promote the health and mental health of Black refugees in Edmonton and Calgary, Alberta. The generated idea statements were further sorted and rated in order of importance and ideas seen in action (or implementation) by a group of 51 participants. Results: In this presentation, we will present the findings that emphasize the close connection between housing, anti-Black racism, and mental health. We found that when ranking which social determinants were most important in addressing the mental health of Black refugees in Canada, there were significant discrepancies between the perceptions of Black community members as compared to the perceptions of professional service providers. Specifically, community leaders and informal support persons with lived experience of anti-Black racism ranked housing as one of the most important and least addressed issues in terms of mental health equity for Black communities, while service providers ranked it as one of the least important and most addressed issue. Conclusion: Our presentation will discuss the relevance and implications of these discrepancies among stakeholders. Housing is a significant mental health and racial equity issue. Associated recommendations for policy makers and practitioners grounded in the needs and perspectives of Black newcomers living in Canada will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.112 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it