MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6922213050 · doi:10.11575/prism/47633

Characterizing Physical and Hydrotechnical Properties of Sediments Surrounding Soap Hole Features Near Didsbury, Alberta, Canada

2024· other· en· W6922213050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentBedrockSedimentary rockPiezometerSlumpingHydrogeologyElectrical resistivity tomographyPermafrostAtterberg limits

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soap holes are discrete occurrences of fluidized sediments that have been reduced to zero effective stress resulting in quick conditions. These features can be detrimental to farming operations through evaporitic concentration of ions in surface sediments surrounding the features or by fatally trapping livestock. Currently, the sediment properties and subsurface conditions required to generate soap holes are relatively unknown. A site investigation conducted near Didsbury, Alberta, analyzed the geologic, hydrogeologic and geotechnical conditions surrounding four active soap hole features to improve the understanding of soap hole formation. Glacially derived surface sediments and Paskapoo formation bedrock were extensively analyzed using a combination electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), cone penetration testing (CPT), and sediment coring and sampling. Laboratory analyses were completed on recovered sediment samples to determine index properties, particle-size distribution, Atterberg consistency limits, dispersive properties and chemical composition. ERT transects indicated there are three distinct sedimentary units on-site, and bedrock depth of approximately 11-mbgs, which was confirmed by drilling. Near-surface sediments are primarily comprised of non-sensitive, over-consolidated fine-grained material, with medium to high plasticity, and are highly dispersive. Discontinuous coarse-grains sediments were also noted in the sediment core, potentially providing flow-paths through the extensive fine-grained sediments. Hydrogeologic conditions were analyzed utilizing pressure transducer data, manual water level measurements, CPT correlations, and single well response tests. Artesian conditions were confirmed within a soap hole feature that was instrumented on site and are suspected to persist in the surrounding features. Pore pressures within and below the instrumented feature correlate with regional potentiometric surface maps of the Paskapoo formation, suggesting hydraulic connection to deep groundwater flow-paths. Strong upward vertical gradients (>1-m/m) within the soap hole feature exceed the critical gradient of surrounding sediments. Downward vertical gradients less than critical were found in most background sediments surrounding the features. Overall, sediments at the study site did not have properties indicative of being prone to liquefication. However, results suggest that high pore pressures, dispersive soils and vertical hydraulic gradients exceeding sediment critical gradients are some of the primary formation mechanisms of the soap hole features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it