MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925276167 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/dpyhr

Mental Health Care Needs of Racial and Ethnic Minorities Living with Chronic Pain: A Scoping Review

2024· other· en· W6925276167 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupMental healthChronic painContext (archaeology)Health careDistressSocial environmentMental distressSocial support

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context Pain is defined as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage” (Raja et al., 2020). Notes accompanying this definition further emphasize that pain is a subjective experience influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors (Raja et al., 2020). As a social factor influencing the experience of pain, disparities in the assessment and treatment of pain among racial and ethnic minorities have been extensively documented for all types of pain (including chronic pain) across healthcare settings (e.g., acute care, primary care; Anderson et al., 2009; Campbell & Edwards, 2012; Green et al., 2003; Hoffman et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2019; Morales & Yong, 2021; Mossey, 2011; Roseen et al., 2022; Stanaway & Campbell, 2022). These disparities in pain assessment and treatment are also likely to extend to mental health care for pain. Mental health care for racial and ethnic minorities living with chronic pain is essential as pain often brings with it an increased risk for psychological distress. Therefore, an understanding of the mental health needs of racial and ethnic minorities living with chronic pain is warranted. Limited research exists on the mental health needs of this population, and this research is even more sparse within the Canadian context. Objectives Thus, the proposed project is aimed at addressing the following research questions: 1. How do ethnic and racial minorities living with chronic pain and associated psychological distress describe their experiences accessing and utilizing mental health care services? It is hypothesized that individuals from ethnic and racial minorities living with chronic pain and associated psychological distress have had challenges in accessing and utilizing mental health care services and that they have also shown resilience in finding ways of managing their psychological distress through mental health care services or other means (e.g., community supports). 2. What mental health care services would meet the needs of ethnic and racial minorities living with chronic pain and associated psychological distress? It is hypothesized that individuals from ethnic and racial minorities living with chronic pain and associated psychological distress will share several ideas regarding the type of mental health care services that would meet their needs and that these ideas will differ across and within ethnic and racial minority groups. Methodology The proposed study will be comprised of three components: 1. Community Engagement: Throughout the phases of the proposed study, our research team will consult with individuals belonging to racial or ethnic minority groups with lived experiences of chronic pain. We will hold meetings with these community members in which they are encouraged to share their lived experiences while the research team listens and integrates these insights into the work being conducted. The research team has appropriate experience in community-engaged research in Saskatchewan and across Canada. 2. Scoping Review: The first phase of the proposed study will involve a scoping review of the current literature to understand and map out the currently documented racial and ethnic disparities in accessing and utilizing mental health care while living with chronic pain. This scoping review will guide the design and implementation of a sequential mixed methods explanatory study as described below. More specifically, it will allow the research team to identify the most appropriate self-report questionnaires and interview questions for our mixed methods study. 3. Sequential Mixed Methods Explanatory Study: For this mixed methods study, participants will include individuals belonging to racial or ethnic minority groups who are at least 18 years of age, live in Canada, and are living with chronic pain and associated psychological distress. Recruitment will involve partnerships with community organizations that serve individuals living with chronic pain so that these community organizations can distribute information about the study through their mailing lists, newsletters, bulletin boards, or social media posts. The quantitative phase of the study will involve the distribution of a set of self-report questionnaires to racial and ethnic minorities across Canada. While the specific self-report questionnaires will be identified as part of the scoping review, we expect that our set of questionnaires will include questions regarding participants’ experience of chronic pain, access and utilization of mental health care services currently available, and their needs with respect to culturally appropriate mental health care services. Data analysis will include, as appropriate, descriptive and inferential statistics. For the qualitative phase of the study, a subsample of participants from the quantitative study will be invited to participate in a follow-up individual interview to further expand on the abovementioned topics. Reflexive thematic analysis will be employed in the analysis of narrative responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.415 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it