How do Canadians really feel about Cannabis? Levels of support and consumer perceptions of cannabis regulations in Canada.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In October 2018, the Cannabis Act was passed in Canada, legalizing the use, growth, and sale of cannabis from authorized sources for recreational purposes. The Act includes regulations intended to minimize the public health impact of legalization. To date, there is little evidence on the impact of specific cannabis regulations, including their impact on consumer use and perceptions. The study has three objectives: 1) to examine awareness and support for nine specific policies: cannabis legalization, authorized retailers, retail store density, mandatory health warnings on packages, retail store marketing, restrictions on advertising, personal possession limits, and THC limits on cannabis edibles and vaping products; 2) to examine differences in levels of support based on cannabis consumption; and 3) to examine differences in levels of support among cannabis consumers who report sourcing products from 'legal' versus 'illegal' retail stores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it