MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929373501 · doi:10.48336/2w0n-xe71

Blind-time domain motion compensation of and significant-wave height extraction from high-frequency (HF) radar data acquired on a floating platform

2023· article· en· W6929373501 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile and Web Applications
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadarAutocorrelationAntenna (radio)Continuous-wave radarDoppler effectTransmitterPulse-Doppler radarRadar engineering detailsDoppler radar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-frequency surface wave radar (HFSWR) is recognized as one of the essential tools for remote sensing of the ocean surface. It provides wide-area, all-weather, and near-real time surveillance. However, extracting useful information when the radar is mounted on a oating platform can be challenging since the platform motion may considerably affect and contaminate the high-frequency (HF) radar Doppler spectrum. The usual procedure for extracting ocean surface information from a high-frequency surface wave radar transmitting from a oating platform is to first compensate for the motion of the antenna in the acquired motion-contaminated Doppler spectrum and then extract the ocean wave parameters from the motion-compensated result. Two methods for motion compensation of HF radar signals for the case of a floating transmitter and fixed receiver are proposed when the motion parameters (including the amplitude and angular frequency of the motion) are not known a priori. This study assumes that the floating platform follows a single-frequency motion model. In the first method which is a time-domain technique, we estimate motion parameters from the autocorrelation function of the received electric field. The autocorrelation is related to the received radar cross section by application of an inverse temporal Fourier transform. The motion parameters are estimated by comparing the locations of the zeros of the autocorrelation function for the fixed antenna case with those for an antenna on a oating platform. Then, the zeros associated with the platform motion can be found. Alternatively, in the second method which is a frequency-domain approach, we aimed to estimate platform-motion parameters from the received motion-contaminated Doppler spectrum, which is proportional to the observed radar cross-section of the ocean surface from the oating platform. Motion parameters are determined from ii the relation between the locations and amplitudes of the Bragg peaks and motion- induced peaks, and the amplitude and angular frequency of the motion, respectively. While the results from both methods show that the motion parameters are estimated within 10% absolute error, the first method performs the motion compensation in the time domain and does not require frequency-domain data pre-processing, as well as demonstrates generally better results than the second method. The estimated motion parameters are then used to recover the motion-compensated Doppler spectrum from the Doppler spectrum of the antenna on a floating platform, and the results coincide well with the Doppler spectrum of the fixed antenna. In the next stage of the thesis, a new real-time method is proposed to estimate the significant wave height directly from the antenna's received electric field in the time- domain without requiring prior knowledge of the motion parameters or performing motion compensation. Based on the relation between the ocean surface displacement and the received electric field, this method calculates the significant wave height from the windowed variance of the upper envelope of the received electric field. This method is applied for up to second-order backscatter, and the results are compared with the case when only first-order backscatter is considered, and shows a considerable improvement. A preliminary calibration is required, which can be carried out either by the deployment of a wave buoy or by analyzing the data over a time period during which the sea state varies. The results from this simple proposed technique show that it may be used to estimate the signi�cant wave height with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of less than 12 cm over a wide range of significant wave height values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it