MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931186855 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4913433

Asbestopluma rickettsi Lundsten & Reiswig & Austin 2014, sp. nov.

2014· article· en· W6931186855 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity College of the NorthUniversity of VictoriaSimon Fraser UniversityRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoldfastSpongeRemotely operated underwater vehicleIntertidal zoneStalk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asbestopluma rickettsi sp. nov. Figs. 5 & 6 Type material. Holotype: CASIZ 192771; MBARI specimen D472-A13b; collected by ROV Doc Ricketts May 19, 2013, northwest of La Jolla, California, USA; latitude: 32.90433, longitude: -117.78224, depth 1020 m. Paratype: CASIZ 192772; MBARI specimen D472-A13a; collected by ROV Doc Ricketts May 19, 2013, northwest of La Jolla, California, USA; latitude: 32.90433, longitude: -117.78224, depth 1020 m. Type locality. Northwest of La Jolla, California, USA. Etymology. Named in honor of Edward F. Ricketts, marine biologist and ecologist made popular as ‘Doc Ricketts’ in John Steinbeck’s Cannery Row. He is best known as co-author of Between Pacific Tides, a pioneering book on intertidal ecology. Coincidentally, the type specimens were collected by MBARI’s ROV Doc Ricketts. Diagnosis. Branching Cladorhizidae with three size classes of megascleres and three microscleres including an acanthose tylostyle, and sigma of one size class, and palmate anisochelae of two size classes. Description. An arborescent, dichotomously-branching sponge with bottle-brush arrangement of filaments (Fig. 5A–C). Holotype: Sponge is 21.78 cm tall and 12.38 cm wide (Fig. 5D). At the base, the stalk is 4.5 mm wide and branches all taper to approximately 1 mm in width distally. Filaments are 0.9–1.2 mm in length (Fig. 5E–F). Attached to hard substrate via conic holdfast disk, 1.26 cm in width. Paratype: Filaments are 1.5 – 5 mm in length. Sponge is 21.78 cm tall and 12.38 cm wide (Fig. 5G). At the base, the stalk is 3.4 mm wide and branches all taper to approximately 1 mm width distally. Sponge is white in situ and in preserved state. Spicules. Large styles 1 (Fig. 6A, Table 1) fusiform, straight, often with pointed end rounded, in axes of branches and stem: L 956 ± 50 µm (n=50), W 19.8 ± 1.8 µm (n=50). Large styles 2 (Fig. 6B), fusiform, straight or slightly curved, in filaments and their inserts in branch axes: L 642.6 ± 62.6 µm (n=50), W 14.0 ± 2.5 µm (n=66). Large styles to anisostrongyles 3 (Fig. 6C), fusiform, thick, strongly bent, mainly in basal cone: L 555 ± 53 µm (n=50), W 26.6 ± 6.4 µm (n=50). Microacanthotylostrongyle (Fig. 6D) thin, rough, mostly curved, occurs in basal cone and sparsely throughout branch axes: L 102.6 ± 9.8 µm (n=50), W 1.5 ± 0.4 µm (n=50). Sigma (Fig. 6E) without profile discontinuity near ends (not clearly sigmancistroid), rare throughout specimen: L 17.06 ± 1.3 µm (n=50). Anisochelae 1 (Fig 6F) robust, palmate with wide lateral wings and narrow tooth slightly wider than shaft: L 53.5 ± 5.3 µm (n=50), occurs rarely throughout. Anisochelae 2 (Fig. 6G) palmate head, foot with frontal tooth bearing two broad lateral flukes, lateral wings short and never meet the frontal tooth; narrow lower foot shaft looks like a short blunt spur but true spur is lacking; occurs abundantly throughout the specimen: L 9.3 ± 0.7 µm (n=50). Habitat and associated fauna. Asbestopluma rickettsi was observed and collected while surveying a chemosynthetic community in a low-oxygen basin off southern California, northwest of La Jolla. Twenty-one individuals were observed in an area of active fluid flow. The substrate was composed of outcrops of authigenic carbonate with a thin sediment veneer. Other organisms observed include vesicomyid clams, siboglinid tube worms, and mats of flocculent bacteria. Average depth of observation was 1031 m (±48.5; n=21), oxygen concentration was low at 0.33 ml/L (±0.001; n=21), and temperature averaged 3.93 °C (±0.02; n=21). No evidence of crustacean prey capture was observed in A. rickettsi. This specimen was collected in an area with an active chemosynthetic community and was found to be utilizing methane-oxidizing bacteria as a food source (V. Orphan, California Institute of Technology, pers. comm.). It remains to be seen whether these bacteria are true symbionts, as has been demonstrated in one other species of Cladorhizidae. Remarks. Asbestopluma rickettsi differs from A. formosa (Vacelet, 2006), in that it lacks the characteristic embryo-containing branching enlargements, it does not have fan shaped branches divided dichotomously three or four times in a single plane with terminal branches being long, thin, and parallel, and it does not have microstrongyles. It differs from A. desmophora (Kelly and Vacelet, 2011) as it lacks both desmas and sigmancistras. This new species differs from A. bitrichela (Lopes et al., 2011) in a lack of desmas and anchorate/ unguiferate anisochelae. Asbestopluma rickettsi differs from A. delicata (Lopes et al., 2011) in absence of microstrongyles and palmate isochelae. It differs from A. magnifica (Lopes et al., 2011) considerably in size (A. magnifica is ~50% longer), in size classes of megascleres (A. rickettsi has larger styles), a larger anisochelae 1 size (~ 34 µm vs. 52 µm) and presence of large alae of large anisochelae. Asbestopluma rickettsi differs from A. furcata (Lundbeck, 1905) in having larger megasclere style sizes. A comparison of spicule data for all known Asbestopluma species through 2011 is published in Lopes et al., (2011). A. rickettsi differs from A. monticola in that it has two size classes of anisochelae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207