MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931588702 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5679778

Ablabesmyia (Asayia) annulata Say

2011· article· en· W6931588702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaverFishingPupaMileLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ablabesmyia (Asayia) annulata (Say) (Figs 1; 2 G; 3 G, 4 G, N; 5 I; 9 D–F; 10) Material examined. CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg: Victoria Beach, 2 males, 9.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 1 male, 10.vii. 1969; Gull Harbour, 8 males, 16.vii. 1969; Gimli Government Wharf, 3 males, 24.vii. 1969; Victoria Beach, 2 males, 25.vii. 1969; Matheson Island Government Wharf, 1 male, 26.vii. 1969; Grand Rapids Government Wharf, 6 males, 28.vii. 1969; McBeth Harbour, 3 males, 29.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 3 males, 31.vii. 1969; Beaver Point, 29 males, 3 females, 30.vi. –19.viii. 1971; 20 Mile Creek, 8 males, 26.viii. & 1.ix. 1971; Old Fishing Dock, 691 males, 29.vi. –18.viii. 1971; Calder's Dock, 17 males, 6.vii. –8.ix. 1971; Hecla Island, 9 males, 25.viii. 1971; north of outer buoy of Red River, 1 male reared from larva, 4.vi. 1971; 12 km east northeast of Winnipeg Beach, 1 male reared from larva, 12.vi. 1971; east of Elk Island, 1 male reared from larva, 10.vii. 1971; South Basin, 71 larvae, 4.vi.–31.x. 1969; Narrows, 48 larvae, 4.vi.–31.x. 1969; North Basin, 6 larvae, 9.vii. –31.x. 1969. This was the only Ablabesmyia common in the bottom samples of Lake Winnipeg. The male, illustrated in Fig. 9 D–F, shows a considerable variation in the coloration of the abdominal tergites. Some specimens have a completely dark abdomen. However, they are easily recognizable by means of the wings and the leg coloration. Furthermore, one of the reared specimens is a female with completely dark abdomen. Pupa (n = 1–2). Total length 5.95–7.69 mm. Exuviae pale grayish brown. Cephalothorax. Thoracic horn (Fig.G) 632–761 µm long, 307–368 µm wide, 2.06–2.07 times as long as wide, with apicolateral papilla 0.69–0.87 from base. Thoracic comb (Fig. G) consisting of 15–21 spines, the longest 55– 60 µm. Abdomen. Tergites with shagreen of multibranched spinulae. LS1-seta on VII located at or posterior to midpoint. Anal lobe (Fig. G) 1.07–1.30 times as long as wide; 2 outer margin with 15 spinules distad of distal setae and about 25 spinules basad of basal seta. Fourth instar larva (n = 11–16, except when otherwise stated). Total length 7.52–10.07, 8.79 mm. Head capsule length 1.10–1.44, 1.29 mm (107) (see Fig. 10). Head. Antenna as in Fig. 4 G. Lengths of antennal segments (in µm): 558–730, 643 (105, see Fig. 10); 80–109, 99; 6–9, 8; 3–5, 4. AR 5.36–6.86, 6.01 (85, see Fig. 10). Basal antennal segment 40–50, 45 µm wide; ring organ 0.60–0.64, 0.62 from base; B1 84–110, 100 µm; accessory blade 84–104, 98 µm, long. Apical style of second segment 8–11, 9 µm long; accessory style 3–5, 4 µm long. Mandible 234–280, 252 µm long. Maxillary palp (Fig. 5 I) 2-segmented; basal segment 62–78, 70 µm long, 20–24, 22 µm wide; apical segment 46–64, 58 µm long; 11–14, 12 µm wide. Ligula (Fig. 4 N) 164–190, 178 µm long; apices of teeth even, median and inner teeth truncate with paler apices. Paraglossa 72–88, 82 µm long. Hypopharyngeal pecten with 18–21, 20 teeth. Abdomen. Procercus 343–442, 391 µm high; 60–76, 67 µm wide at base; 5.08–7.02, 5.87 times as high as wide. Anal setae 1300–1509, 1379 µm long; supraanal seta 345–442, 391 µm long; supraanal seta/anal setae 0.25– 0.34, 0.29. Anal tubules 405–527, 469 µm long. Posterior parapods 1104–1594, 1388 µm long; with numerous strong spinulae on distal 0.4–0.5; without any darker claws. Third instar larva. Head capsule length 0.69–0.85, 0.74 mm (21). AR 3.87–4.84, 4.32 (15). Basal antennal segment 312–374, 344 µm (21) long. Second instar larva (n = 2). Head capsule length 0.42–0.47 mm. AR 3.52–3.60. Basal antennal segment 170– 184 µm long. (For distribution among instars of head capsule lengths, AR and length of basal antennal segments see Fig. 10.) Distribution and ecology. The species is known from Québec to Saskatchewan and south to California, Texas and Florida (Roback 1971: 379; Hudson et al. 1990: 3; Oliver et al. 1990: 10; Spies 1999; Epler 2003, 2010; Caldwell 2009; Ashe & O’Connor 2009: 121). Sublette (1957: 381) found that A. annulata in Lake Texoma, Oklahoma and Texas, were littoral occurring in depths down to 6 m and with a maximum at 2 m. The unusually blunt teeth of the ligula of A. annulata suggests that the species has a specialized method of feeding, compared to other Ablabesmyia species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMachine Learning and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207