MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931656303 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6280307

Orchelimum Serville 1839

2000· article· en· W6931656303 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Systems and Laser Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusMonophylyRange (aeronautics)Degree (music)Taxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1839 Serville, Hist. nat. Ins., Orthopt.: 522 1915a Rehn & Hebard, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 41: 11-83 >>revision 1999 Naskrecki and Otte, Illustr. Cat. Orthop. I (CD ROM) >>references; types illustrated Note: The genus Orchelimum is an example of a group maintained in the taxonomic literature by tradition rather than actual diagnostic characteristics that can identify it as a natural, monophyletic assemblage. Rehn and Hebard (1915a) present a combination of characters that supposedly identify Orchelimum as a genus distinct from Conocephalus, but even they admit that none of the characters is unique to Orchelimum and all of them occur, albeit less frequently, in Conocephalus. The only relatively consistent characteristics of Orchelimum spp. are their more robust appearance and larger body form, but even these characters broadly overlap with some species of Conocephalus. There are no consistent differences between the two genera either in the male or female genitalic structures, the male stridulatory apparatus, wing venation, leg armature, or any other structures considered diagnostic for Tettigoniidae. Glenn K. Morris (personal communication) provides two behavioral characters that may indicate a degree of separateness of the two genera. The dominant spectral peak of the male’s call in Orchelimum is in the acoustic range (about 18 kHz) whereas in Conocephalus (where unfortunately only a small fraction of species have ever been recorded) the dominant spectral peak is in the ultrasonic range (30 kHz and above). Morris notes, however, that “this song parameter is of course not unrelated to size, though it is not fair to say that frequency is simply dictated by size”. The second behavioral character apparently unique to Orchelimum is high incidence of male fighting, and many of the species known to fight do it by grappling. The latter is unknown to occur in males of Conocephalus. These observations, however, are based on a very limited number of species. Despite the lack of strong support for the separate status of the genus Orchelimum, it seems unwise to synonymize the two genera at this point as both names are well established in taxonomic literature and many species of Orchelimum are easily recognizable based on their larger size and sometimes distinct coloration. For the purpose of this review Orchelimum is treated as a separate, yet very closely related to Conocephalus genus of Conocephalinae s.l. Body slender to robust, small to medium size as for the family; macropterous or mesopterous (Figs. 3 A); tegumen smooth. Fastigium of vertex laterally compressed, rounded apically, never cone-shaped; no traces of genal carinae present; mandibles and labrum symmetrical; eyes relatively large. Pronotum short, lateral lobes approximately triangular, humeral sinus weak to well developed, posterior edge of lobe with well developed “secondary tympanum.” Stridulatory file with peg like teeth, strongly sinusoidal. All legs slender, fore and mid femora unarmed on lower margins. Male cercus always armed with one internal tooth; ovipositor weakly to distinctly curved, lower and upper edges of ovipositor parallel to divergent midlength. Description (male except where specified) Head.— Fastigium of vertex 0.75 to 1.4 times as wide as scapus (Figs. 3 B-C), laterally compressed, rounded dorsally and apically, never hook- or cone-shaped, never projecting strongly in front of eyes; fastigium of vertex touching fastigium of frons. Eyes large relative to size of head, weakly protruding. Frons weakly convex, smooth; tegumen of head smooth, without traces of genal carinae; face slender to moderately wide. Mandibles and labrum symmetrical. Thorax and wings.— Dorsal surface of pronotum smooth, flat or metazona slightly raised; anterior dorsal margin straight, posterior one straight or weakly convex; lateral lobes approximately triangular, with acute posterior angle; posterior edge of lateral lobe with “secondary tympanum” – a somewhat raised, narrowly elliptical area of thinner cuticle covering thoracic auditory spiracle; humeral sinus poorly to well developed (Fig. 3 A). Thoracic auditory spiracle large, elliptical, completely hidden under lateral lobe of pronotum; posterior edge of spiracle unmodified. Prosternum armed with two thin, short spines (modified basisternum); meso- and metasternum with lateral lobes of basisterna small, triangular, their inner margins touching; posterior part of metasternum strongly compressed causing hind coxa to nearly touch each other. Wings in both sexes fully developed, surpassing apices of hind femora, rarely somewhat shortened and not reaching hind knees; hind wings usually distinctly longer than tegmina. Stridulatory apparatus of male well developed; stridulatory area of left wing membranous, without a network of secondary veinlets; stridulatory file (vein AA1—new vein homology after Kukalova-Peck, personal communication; male stridulatory file used to be homologized with the vein Cu2) sinusoidal (Fig. 41 A), teeth thick, peg-like, sparsely arranged, especially on distal end of file; mirror of right wing approximately rectangular, with secondary veinlet next to AA1 always well developed, divergent from AA1. Legs.— All legs long and slender; fore coxa with an elongate, forward projecting spine dorsally. All femora unarmed dorsally; fore and mid femora unarmed ventrally, hind femora armed ventrally with relatively few minute spines or unarmed; genicular lobes of femora usually armed with short spines. Fore and mid tibiae unarmed dorsally, both ventral margins with immovable spines as long as 1/4 to 1/2 diameter of tibia; hind tibia armed on all four dorsal and ventral margins; apex of tibia with two pairs of ventral and one pair of dorsal movable spurs. Tympanum on fore tibia bilaterally closed, tympanal slits facing forward, tympanal area weakly to distinctly swollen, with pair of small, elongated pits below tympanal slits. Abdomen.— Dorsal surface of abdominal terga smooth, unmodified. Male 10th tergite usually strongly sclerotized, with narrow apical incision, supraanal plate small, triangular. Male cercus always with one internal spine, often accompanied by more or less developed dorsal, sinusoid groove (Fig. 41 C); female cercus, simple, slender and weakly incurved. Subgenital plate of male with a pair of styli, distinct median keel, truncated apically (Fig. 3 D) or with triangular apical emargination; female subgenital plate approximately triangular, rounded or shallowly emarginated apically. Concealed genitalia of male with paired, heavily sclerotized, hook-like titillators (Fig. 3 E). Ovipositor narrow, straight to distinctly curved; its length variable, from less than half the length to almost as long as hind femur; both dorsal and ventral margins of ovipositor smooth, parallel to divergent midlength; apex of upper valvula sharp (Fig. 3 F). Coloration.— General coloration green to brown, almost invariably with dark, wide stripe on head and pronotum; head sometimes red dorsally (O. erythrocephalum Davis) or face with median brown stripe (O. concinnum Scudder); abdomen green or yellow; sometimes dorsal side of abdomen yellow, with dark, longitudinal stripes. Tegmina straw brown to light green; legs green to light brown. Remarks.— The genus Orchelimum includes 23 described species, distributed from south-eastern Canada, throughout eastern United states, Mexico to northern Costa Rica. Most species occur in moist freshwater habitats among sedges or reeds, along streams or margins of ponds. Some species occur in less typical habitats such as dry weedy fields, salt marshes, and two species are arboreal. The only Costa Rican species of the genus, O. fraternum, occurs on tall grassy vegetation along edges of the dry forest of Guanacaste as well as in open, savanna-like grasslands. It is a diurnal species, with males singing all day from tall vegetation. Nothing is know of their natural diet but in captivity they accepted grass seeds and various vegetables and fruits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicOptical Systems and Laser TechnologyFrench-language works237,207