MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944296655 · doi:10.17920/g9331j

Reproductive concerns and depression among younger survivors

2008· other· en· W6944296655 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2008
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerDepression (economics)FertilityIntervention (counseling)MenopauseQuarter (Canadian coin)CancerSurvivorship curve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About a quarter of breast cancer cases in the United States are diagnosed in premenopausal women. The issues and decisions faced by younger women are different than those of older women, including concerns about early menopause, fertility, and long-term survivorship. Breast cancer treatment may increase the risk of early menopause and cause difficulties with fertility. This can be especially challenging for younger women who have not finished growing their families. There is limited research on how fertility problems impact the long-term well-being breast cancer survivors. The primary questions we will address among younger breast cancer survivors in this project include: (1) how do symptoms of depression change over time?, and (2) are problems with fertility associated with increased symptoms of depression over time? In addition, we will describe younger breast cancer survivors’ reproductive history, experiences with fertility-related side effects of treatment, and whether they made treatment decisions in order to maintain fertility. We will use data from approximately 200 younger breast cancer survivors who participated in the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study. WHEL is a nutritional intervention designed to test whether a diet high in fruits and vegetables can lower breast cancer recurrence. The sample for this study includes survivors who were 40 at younger when they were diagnosed and who have agreed to be contacted again. Some data has already been collected, including demographics, cancer characteristics/treatment, and physical and mental well-being. We will conduct a follow-up survey to ask whether survivors wanted to have children or attempted pregnancy, whether they’ve had problems with infertility or fertility-related side effects of their treatment, whether they currently have any symptoms of depression, and about their current feelings toward pregnancy and their ability to have children. There are few studies that follow a group of younger breast cancer survivors over time. The WHEL study includes a significant number of younger women who have survived for 10 years or longer. The proposed project provides a great opportunity to combine existing long-term data with new questions to explore the association between the reproductive concerns and long-term well being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it