As artes de curar em um manuscrito jesuÃtico inédito do Setecentos: o Paraguay Natural Ilustrado do padre José Sánchez Labrador (1771- 1776)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The handwritten manuscript format has been the most common instrument of disclosure and circulation of knowledge and information even after the invention of press.The culture of the scribes was faster and more economical, 1 which contributed to the circulation of manuscripts' dynamics during the 17 th and 18 th centuries.The members of the Society of Jesus who acted as missionaries in America were responsible for the production of knowledge about the New World.During their expeditions they worked in different instances and places and had contact with indigenous groups and nature.Millones-Figueroa and Ledezma stated that the Jesuits' intellectual work in and about America resulted in a number of different productions, such as cosmographic and astronomic treatises, dictionaries, natural histories, curiosities and compendia of Geography and Botany.These productions were important for people from inside as well as outside the Society of Jesus and were widely used. 2 Although some of the Jesuits' work is well researched and currently being studied by historians, there are also a number of unpublished handwritten manuscripts.Residing in archives these manusripts are not readily accessible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it