MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945661019 · doi:10.25547/jdef-6f05

Challenges, Responses and Available Resources: Success in Rural Small Businesses

2022· article· en· W6945661019 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Textual Cultures Lab · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Face (sociological concept)Rural areaEntrepreneurshipGovernment (linguistics)Small business

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Rural communities and their residents aze exploring the potential of small business and entrepreneurship to address the economic changes they are facing. While these rural areas present many opportunities, business people in these areas face challenges which they must navigate to operate successfully. However, little is known about these specific challenges and the manner in which business owners respond to them. This paper reports on a qualitative study of small rural businesses in a rural region of Canada that begins to answer this question. The research found that these owners face particular challenges in the area of market size, labour availability, access to urban centres, infrastructure gaps, and large time demands. As they work to mitigate these, the owners draw upon locally available resources, such as themselves, their family, business, and community. The paper concludes with recommendations for government policies and programs to support economic development in these rural regions.</p> <p>Les collectivités rurales et leurs résidents évaluent le rôle que peuvent jouer les petites entreprises et l'entrepreneuriat afin de répondre aux changements économiques auxquels ils font face. Malgré que ces régions rurales offrent beaucoup d'opportunités d'affaires, les gens d'affaires de ces régions doivent surmonter certains défis afin d'assurer le bon fonctionnement de leur entreprise. Il existe cependant peu d'information dans la littérature au sujet des défis spécifiques auxquels ces gens d'affaires doivent faire face et sur les façons dont ils s'y prennent pour les surmonter. Le travail suivant rapporte les résultats d'une étude qualitative portant sur de petites entreprises rurales situées dans une région rurale du Canada qui révèle des réponses préliminaires à ces questions. L’étude a révélé que ces propriétaires font face à des défis particuliers en ce qui a trait à : la taille du marché, la disponibilité de la main-d'oeuvre, l'accès aux centres urbains, les lacunes en matière d'infrastructure, et le grand nombre d'heures requises. Afin d'atténuer les problèmes engendrés par ces conditions particulières, les propriétaires d'entreprises se tournent vers les ressources disponibles localement, telles qu'eux-mêmes, leur famille, leur entreprise et leur collectivité. En conclusion, ce travail apporte des recommandations concernant des politiques et des programmes gouvernementaux destinés à soutenir le développement économique dans ces régions rurales.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it