MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6947992690 · doi:10.4230/lipics.icalp.2025.20

Improved Approximation Algorithms for Capacitated Network Design and Flexible Graph Connectivity

2025· article· en· W6947992690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsApproximation algorithmRoundingGraphSet cover problemStrength of a graphSet (abstract data type)Graph theoryConnected dominating setNetwork planning and designGraph algorithms

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present improved approximation algorithms for some problems in the related areas of Capacitated Network Design and Flexible Graph Connectivity. In the Cap-k-ECSS problem, we are given a graph G = (V,E) whose edges have non-negative costs and positive integer capacities, and the goal is to find a minimum-cost edge-set F such that every non-trivial cut of the graph G' = (V,F) has capacity at least k. Let n = |V| and let u_{min} (respectively, u_{max}) denote the minimum (respectively, maximum) capacity of an edge; assume that u_{max} ≤ k. We present an O(log({k}/u_{min}))-approximation algorithm for the Cap-k-ECSS problem, asymptotically improving upon the previous best approximation ratio of min(O(log{n}), k, 2u_{max}, 6 ⋅ {⌈ k/u_{min} ⌉}) whenever log(k/u_{min}) = o(log{n}) and u_{max} is sufficiently large. In the (p,q)-Flexible Graph Connectivity problem, denoted (p,q)-FGC, the input is a graph G = (V, E) where E is partitioned into safe and unsafe edges, and the goal is to find a minimum-cost edge-set F such that the subgraph G' = (V, F) remains p-edge connected upon removal of any q unsafe edges from F. We present an 8-approximation algorithm for the (1,q)-FGC problem that improves upon the previous best approximation ratio of (q+1). Both of our results are obtained by using natural LP relaxations strengthened with the knapsack-cover inequalities, and then, during the rounding process, utilizing a recent O(1)-approximation algorithm for the Cover Small Cuts problem. In the latter problem, the goal is to find a minimum-cost set of links such that each non-trivial cut of capacity less than a specified value is covered by a link. We also show that the problem of covering small cuts inherently arises in another variant of (p,q)-FGC. Specifically, we give Cook reductions that preserve approximation ratios within O(1) factors between the (2,q)-FGC problem and the 2-Cover Small Cuts problem; in the latter problem, each small cut needs to be covered by two links.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it