Just revolutionary violence: on the possibility of novelty in political life
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis addresses two interrelated issues. The first is how we come to think and enact the possibility of overturning the political order in which we find ourselves. This is of particular issue when we consider that our situations always over-determine our possibilities for thinking and acting. The second issue involves the question of how revolutionary violence can be said to be just, or in other words how the act of violence can avoid reinscribing a state of affairs only superficially different from the violent one it sought to overturn. I address these issues using the works of Frantz Fanon and Alain Badiou, two figures in the existential-phenomenological tradition. Fanon’s phenomenological account of oppression gives us a concrete context for thinking the conditions of revolutionary action as presented by Badiou’s ontology. I argue that Badiou’s ontology can account for the lived experience of political oppression as well as the possibility revolutionary violence, despite its “Platonic” idealism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it