MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950570518 · doi:10.5284/1099659

11 The Granary, Arlesey

2018· article· en· W6950570518 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural (archaeology)RubbleEarthworksExcavationDebrisTaphonomyPleistocene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The monitoring of the development groundworks at 11 The Granary, Arlesey, Bedfordshire, revealed a stratigraphic sequence consisting of various layers of modern overburden directly overlying the natural. It was observed that these were deeper at the western end of the site. The lack of top- and subsoils indicates that the site has been subject to significant ground reduction. Some reduction may have occurred in the early 20th century, to level the ground for a former farm building, but the removal of all evidence for this structure from the site suggests that some further ground reduction was carried out when The Granary estate was built. The greater depth of made ground at the western end of the site may reflect the natural slope of the ground. Late 19th and 20th century OS mapping shows that until the late 20th century the site formed part of Moorlands Farm. It lay within a small yard to the north of the main farmyard until the early 20th century. Between 1901 and 1922 the site was occupied by a long narrow building range which survived until the 1990s. No remains relating to the structure that formerly occupied the site were encountered during the present works, but layers of probable demolition rubble were observed at the western end of the footings trenches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it