MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6957495891 · doi:10.60692/npkv8-ah950

DE VANCOUVER (1982) A VIENA (1999): LA EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA TOMA NUEVOS RUMBOS

2013· article· en· W6957495891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)WorkforceDistance educationDiversity (politics)Emerging technologies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis and comparison between the papers and tendencies presented on the two ICDE Conferences of Vancouver (1982) and Vienna (1999), had made possible visualize the vigorous development and important changes of Distance Education during these seventeenth (17) years. Vienna (1999) debated the advances of some fundamental themes presented at Vancouver (1982), but in addition, also some new themes as: Globalization; Policies for Development; Virtual Learning and Virtual Universities, Developing the Company and Workforce Training of the Future, and Markets and marketing. The huge world expansion of Distance Education and the diversity of new technologies available for education, make now indispensable that existing Distance Universities or projected ones, adopt very creative structures and focus, that make possible a great flexibility and capacity to answer rapidly to this new demands and also, to make a better use of modern instruments and technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it