MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6958595654 · doi:10.60692/pz86s-rjd83

Current Prospects and Challenges in Negative-Capacitance Field-Effect Transistors

2023· article· en· W6958595654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)TransistorCurrent (fluid)Power semiconductor deviceElectronicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For decades, the fundamental driving force behind energy-efficient and cost-effective electronic components has been the downward scaling of electronic devices.However, due to approaching the fundamental limits of silicon-based complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) devices, various emerging materials and device structures are considered alternative aspirants, such as negative-capacitance field-effect transistors (NCFETs), for their promising advantages in terms of scaling, speed, and power consumption.In this article, we present a brief overview of the progress made on NCFETs, including theoretical and experimental approaches, a current understanding of NCFET device physics, possible physical mechanisms for NC, and future functionalization prospects.In addition, in the context of recent findings, critical technological difficulties that must be addressed in the NCFET development are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it