Effect Of New Security Regulations On Airline Concentration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An entire set of new airport security regulations were implemented globally after September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on U.S.A. The effect of these new security regulations on competition level of airline industry is analyzed here for international flights arriving and departing from American airports, using enplanement data from 1990 to 2000. It is found here that, new regulations slightly reduced the competition level of the airline industry. However, the change is very subtle. Additionally, these new regulations helped some airline organizations to manipulate the market in their favor. In the forth quarter of 2001 the monopoly rate suddenly and unusually went up around the world. However, the situation persists for only one quarter and this particular issue was resolved from 2002 only. It is proposed that in the oligopoly market the big airline firms were able to use economies of scale, in various forms, to gain market share immediately after the terrorist attack.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it