From Margin(s) To Center(s) The Third World Women’s Alliance (1969-1979)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the history of Third World Women’s Alliance (TWWA), a significant proto-intersectional feminist organization involving women of color during the Sixties and Seventies, through a transnational lens. Drawing on archival sources and oral interviews, the article argues that transnationalism played a pivotal role in shaping the TWWA’s antiimperialist ideology and activism. The first section of the article emphasizes the TWWA’s transnational roots by exploring the connection between Frances M. Beal, one of its founders, and African American intellectuals active in Paris, as well as African students in France during the Sixties. The second section delves into the TWWA’s participation in the two Indochinese Women’s Conferences held in Vancouver and Toronto in 1971, highlighting the TWWA’s reputation as one of the important organizations of women of color in the United States and explores the ongoing connections between the TWWA and Vietnamese delegations in Canada following the conferences. In the final two sections, the article examines how Cuba became a contested site for defining the intricate relationship between gender, race, and class in the United States, and how it served as a political reference point that impacted the TWWA’s activism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".