MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962718926 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/8aj6k

Young families in Bavaria (JuFaBY): Detection of psychosocial stress and utilization of support measures in families with children from 0 to 6 years across Bavaria

2022· other· en· W6962718926 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialMental healthPandemicYoung adultStress (linguistics)Erikson's stages of psychosocial development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measures implemented to contain the Covid 19 pandemic have led to systematic changes in familiar structures over the past 3 years, resulting in multiple psychosocial stresses among families. Psychosocial stress can have a harmful impact on children's health and development (1-3), with young children being particularly vulnerable (4). Psychosocial stress during the pandemic is reflected in an increase of parenting stress (5-7) and psychological problems among parents (8,9). Given the close association between parenting stress, parental mental health, and parenting behaviors (10-12), it is not surprising that parent-child relationships have also suffered in the course of the pandemic (13). In addition, children may have missed important educational and learning opportunities due to limited access to childcare facilities. These factors might have had an impact on children’s mental health during the pandemic. The Bavaria-wide CoronabaBY study - the first project in Germany to explicitly address psychosocial stress in families with infants and young children during the pandemic – has demonstrated clear signs of psychosocial stress in young families compared to pre-pandemic data (14). Even during periods of low incidences and associated "relaxations" (i.e., the summer months), stress parameters did not decrease. Rather, the number of psychosocially stressed families increased steadily during the course of the pandemic (15). Alongside the pandemic, other societal challenges, such as the onset of the economic crisis, the impact of the Ukraine war, and climate change have led to the experience of “multi-crisis times”, and can fuel fears and concerns about the future and place additional stress on young families. Systematic and reliable identification of families with psychosocial support needs is urgently indicated in order to prevent negative direct and indirect effects on child health. Burdened families could also find easier access to appropriate support services by communicating information in a needs-based manner (e.g., via smartphone app). Hence, we aim to examine (1) psychosocial stress factors in N = 5,000 families with children aged 0-6 years old (2) the effectiveness of an app-based information module on psychosocial support for young families (=intervention). We therefore perform a Bavaria-wide intervention study (JuFaBY) over a study period of 18 months in total with two measurement time points for each participant (at study entry and 6 months later). (1) Werner, E. E. (1993). Risk, resilience, and recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai Longitudinal Study. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 503-515. (2) Laucht, M., Esser, G. & Schmid, M. H. (1997). Developmental Outcome of Infants Born with Biological and Psychosocial Risks. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(7), 843-854. (3) Laucht, M., Schmidt, M. H. & Esser, G. (2002). Motorische, kognitive und sozial-emotionale Entwicklung von 11-Jährigen mit frühkindlichen Risikobelastungen: späte Folgen. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, 30(1), 5-19. (4) Schlack, H. G. (2009). Sozialpädiatrie: Eine Standortbestimmung. In H. G. Schlack, R. von Kries & U. Thyen (Eds.), Sozialpädiatrie. Gesundheitswissenschaft und pädiatrischer Alltag (pp. 1-8). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. (5) Giannotti, M., Mazzoni, N., Bentenuto, A., Venuti, P. & de Falco, S (2021). Family adjustment to COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: Parental stress, coparenting, and child externalizing behavior. Fam Process, 1-19. (6) Spinelli, M., Lionetti, F., Setti, A. & Fasolo, M (2020). Parenting Stress During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Socioeconomic and Environmental Risk Factors and Implications for Children Emotion Regulation. Fam Process, 60(2):639-53. (7) Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Ben-Yaakov, O. & Chasson, M (2021). Parenting stress among new parents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Abuse Negl, 117:105080. (8) Panda, P.K., Gupta, J., Chowdhury, S.R., Kumar, R., Meena, A.K., Madaan, P. et al. (2021). Psychological and Behavioral Impact of Lockdown and Quarantine Measures for COVID-19 Pandemic on Children, Adolescents and Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Trop Pediatr, 67(1). (9) Racine, N., Hetherington, E., McArthur, B.A., McDonald, S., Edwards, S., Tough, S. et al. (2021). Maternal depressive and anxiety symptoms before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: a longitudinal analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(5):405-15. (10) Farmer, A.Y. & Lee, S.K. (2011). The Effects of Parenting Stress, Perceived Mastery, and Maternal Depression on Parent-Child Interaction. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(5):516-25. (11) Thomason, E., Volling, B.L., Flynn, H.A., McDonough, S.C., Marcus, S.M., Lopez, J.F. & Vazquez, D.M (2014). Parenting stress and depressive symptoms in postpartum mothers: bidirectional or unidirectional effects? Infant Behavior and Development, 37(3): 406-415. (12) Vismara, L., Rollè, L., Agostini, F., Sechi, C., Fenaroli, V., Molgora S. et al. (2016). Perinatal Parenting Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Outcomes in First-Time Mothers and Fathers: A 3- to 6-Months Postpartum Follow-Up Study. Front Psychol, 7. (13) Russell, B.S., Hutchison, M., Tambling, R., Tomkunas, A.J. & Horton, A.L. (2020). Initial Challenges of Caregiving During COVID-19: Caregiver Burden, Mental Health, and the Parent-Child Relationship. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev, 51(5):671-82. (14) Buechel, C., Nehring, I., Seifert, C., Eber, S., Behrends, U., Mall, V., Friedmann, A. (2022). A cross-sectional investigation of psychosocial stress factors in German families with children aged 0-3 years during the COVID-19 pandemic: initial results of the CoronabaBY study. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 16, 37. (15) Buechel, C., Nehring, I., Seifert, C., Eber, S., Laub, O., Ewald, D., Behrends, U., Mall, V., Friedmann, A. (2022). Abnahme der Pandemiebeschränkungen = Abnahme der psychosozialen Belastungen bei Familien mit Kindern im Alter von 0-3 Jahren? Ein repetitiver Querschnitts-Vergleich in Bayern (CoronabaBY-Studie). Posterpräsentation. Kongress für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin 2022. Düsseldorf, 08.09.22.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207