MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962888954 · doi:10.17863/cam.58932

Stroke in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020· article· en· W6962888954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApollo (University of Cambridge) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Language Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)Diabetes mellitusAcute strokeDiseaseCoronary artery diseaseMortality rateVascular diseaseMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic, affecting millions of people. However, the relationship between COVID-19 and acute cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) is unclear. Aims: We aimed to characterize the incidence, risk factors, clinical-radiological manifestations and outcome of COVID-19-associated stroke. Methods: Three medical databases were systematically reviewed for published articles on acute CVD in COVID-19 (December 2019-September 2020). The review protocol was previously registered (PROSPERO ID=CRD42020185476). Data were extracted from articles reporting 5 stroke cases in COVID-19. We complied with the PRISMA guidelines, and used the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale to assess data quality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Summary of review: Of 2,277 initially identified articles, 61 (2.7%) were entered in the meta-analysis. Out of 108,571 patients with COVID-19, acute CVD occurred in 1.4% (95%CI: 1.0-1.9). The most common manifestation was acute ischemic stroke (87.4%); intracerebral haemorrhage was less common (11.6%). Patients with COVID-19 developing acute CVD, compared to those who did not, were older (pooled median difference=4.8 years; 95%CI:1.7-22.4), more likely to have hypertension (OR=7.35; 95%CI:1.94-27.87), diabetes mellitus (OR=5.56; 95%CI:3.34-9.24), coronary artery disease (OR=3.12; 95%CI:1.61-6.02), and severe infection (OR=5.10; 95%CI:2.72-9.54). Compared to individuals who experienced a stroke without the infection, patients with COVID-19 and stroke were younger (pooled median difference=-6.0 years; 95%CI:-12.3 to -1.4), had higher NIHSS (pooled median difference=5; 95%CI:3-9), higher frequency of large vessel occlusion (OR=2.73; 95%CI:1.63-4.57), and higher in-hospital mortality rate (OR=5.21; 95% CI:3.43-7.90). Conclusions: Acute CVD is not uncommon in COVID-19, especially in those whom are severely infected and have pre-existing vascular risk factors. The pattern of large vessel occlusion and multi-territory infarcts suggest that cerebral thrombosis and/or thromboembolism could be possible causative pathways for the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it