MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Model of a dynamic orbit correction system based on neural network in CLS

2023· article· en· W6963293960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJACOW · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrbit (dynamics)Artificial neural networkCLs upper limitsPosition (finance)Measure (data warehouse)Beam (structure)Range (aeronautics)Matrix (chemical analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In CLS, Deep Learning was applied to make a dynamic model for the Orbit Correction System (OCS). The OCS consists of 48 sets of BPMs BERGOZ (96 data sheets with 900 Hz recording) that measure the beam position and use the SVD matrix to calculate the strength of the orbit correctors (48 sets of Orbit Correctors 'OC'). The Neural Network was built, trained, and tested using 96 BPM signals. Five layers of the network (Input Layer, Three Hidden Layers, and Output Layer) provide the time evolution of OC's signals (18 Hz), which can be achieved with high accuracy (Mean Square Error = 10e-7). The results are based on data collected during all challenging situations of the CLS storage ring’s current beam position. An Arduino Board was used to test this methodology in real-time, and the time of operation was within the range of system timing (30 - 40 microseconds).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it