ExoNet Database: Wearable Camera Images of Human Locomotion Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in computer vision and artificial intelligence have allowed researchers to develop environment recognition systems for lower-limb exoskeletons and prostheses. However, insufficient and private training databases have impeded the widespread development and dissemination of image classification algorithms for environment recognition. To address these shortcomings, we developed “ExoNet” - the first open-source, large-scale hierarchical database of high-resolution wearable camera images of human locomotion environments. Unparalleled in both scale and diversity, ExoNet comprises over 5.6 million images of different indoor and outdoor real-world walking environments, which were collected using a lightweight wearable smartphone camera system throughout the summer, fall, and winter seasons. Approximately 940,000 images in ExoNet were human-annotated using a 12-class hierarchical classification architecture. Available publicly through IEEE DataPort, ExoNet provides an unprecedented communal platform for training, developing, and comparing image classification algorithms for next-generation environment recognition systems. Beyond the control of lower-limb exoskeletons and prostheses, applications of ExoNet extend to humanoid and autonomous legged robotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".