MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964279580 · doi:10.25949/19440056

Electronic cigarettes in the perioperative period of cardiothoracic surgery: views of Australian clinicians and patients

2019· dissertation· en· W6964279580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacquarie University · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmoking cessationPerioperativeNicotineLung cancerHarm reductionTobacco harm reductionElectronic cigaretteCoronary artery diseaseSurgeon general

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smoking cessation has health benefits, particularly before surgery. Diagnosis, hospitalisation and surgery for tobacco-related illnesses such as coronary artery disease or lung cancer are 'teachable moments' in health promotion, an opportunity to promote smoking cessation among patients. However, many smokers find it difficult to quit. Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), commonly referred to as electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes, may reduce harm in the perioperative period and offer an alternative method of tobacco reduction or cessation in the short and longer term for patients undergoing surgery. However, they are controversial, due to the unknown health effects of long-term use, their efficacy as a cessation aid, and views that electronic cigarettes will either renormalise smoking or be a gateway to tobacco use in younger people. Compared to other developed countries, such as Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, Australia has taken a more precautionary approach to the regulation of electronic cigarettes, thus there is limited research in clinical settings. The thesis examines the awareness and opinions of cardiothoracic clinicians about current clinical smoking cessation guidelines and the impact of smoking and of cessation in the perioperative period. It also examines their views on electronic cigarettes, and the potential role to reduce postoperative complications caused by tobacco smoking and create a sustained quit attempt. Furthermore, the thesis examines the awareness, use and beliefs about electronic cigarettes of patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease or lung cancer awaiting cardiothoracic surgery and the potential role of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid in the perioperative period. The thesis contains three studies based on empirical research in six hospitals in Sydney, New South Wales, consisting of surveys and interviews with 62 patients awaiting cardiothoracic surgery, and indepth interviews with 52 cardiothoracic clinicians - surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses and physiotherapists. Study I explores the knowledge and reported delivery of Australian clinical guidelines for smoking cessation care in the perioperative period of surgery by cardiothoracic clinicians. It reveals inconsistent implementation of clinical guidelines due to the diversity of clinicians' views in delivering smoking cessation, and institutional inadequacies in cessation training, resources and engagement, as categorised using the Behaviour Change Wheel "Capabilities, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour" (COM-B) analysis framework. Two studies explore the opinions of cardiothoracic clinicians and patients towards electronic cigarettes as a potential alternative to tobacco use in the perioperative period. Study II demonstrates a lack of clinician knowledge about electronic cigarettes yet reveals an overall view that, compared to continued tobacco smoking in the perioperative period, electronic cigarette use is regarded as the "lesser of two evils", and a potential bridge to quit for patients who are unable to stop smoking before cardiothoracic surgery. Similar views are expressed by patients awaiting cardiothoracic surgery who smoke or had recently ceased (Study III), particularly those who have previously been unsuccessful with other cessation attempts or are struggling with urges to smoke. The studies reveal the views and needs of patients awaiting surgery who continue to smoke, and are using, or are interested in using, electronic cigarettes to reduce or quit smoking. Both clinicians and patients alike have a similar pragmatic view that, compared to ongoing smoking, electronic cigarette use could reduce tobacco harm around the time of surgery when other smoking cessation methods have been unsuccessful. The studies also highlight the actions needed by local health authorities, hospitals and clinicians to provide more consistent evidence-based smoking cessation care for patients awaiting cardiothoracic surgery. Importantly, findings from this thesis support a review of current Australian perioperative clinical smoking cessation guidelines to encourage clinicians to provide consistent, tangible cessation support, and be prepared to have an informed discussion with patients on using electronic cigarettes to stop smoking and on the benefits and risks of electronic cigarette use in the perioperative period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it