Parkes observations for project P1021 semester 2022APRS_05
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose to continue our observations of PSR J1653-4518 and PSR J1812-15, a pair of long spin-period binary pulsars which both show degrees of orbitally-dependent variability. Binary pulsars are valuable objects of scientific study, allowing for multiple applications including tests of gravity, probes of the neutron star equation of state, and fossil records of stellar evolution. Long spin-period pulsars in binary systems are generally much rarer than faster-spinning `recycled’ pulsars, and represent an under-explored region of pulsar binary evolution. This is particularly true of PSR J1812-15, for which only one other pulsar (B1718-19) seems remotely comparable. Based on previous Parkes proposals, our understanding of these pulsars has significantly increased (including the development of a timing solution for PSR J1653-4518), such that we anticipate their publication in early 2022. However, a minimal low-cadence timing campaign is still required to pursue lingering questions regarding both pulsars. For PSR J1812-15, this data is required to address ongoing problems with phase connection, which may be caused by an undiagnosed glitch or other un-modelled timing effect. For PSR J1653-4518, this data is required to maintain phase-connection in support of a multifrequency observing campaign targeting high-frequency emission during the pulsar’s next anticipated eclipse in November 2022 (an effect seen in similar binary systems). These observations will set up additional publishable results beyond the anticipated near-term publications in early 2022.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.039 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".