MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969281861 · doi:10.5443/624

Long-term monitoring of lemming abundance and reproductive activity on Bylot Island, Nunavut

2016· dataset· en· W6969281861 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Polar Data Network · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowHabitatTrappingFencingAbundance (ecology)Predation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We monitor lemming abundance and demography using three methods. (1) Dead trapping using snap-traps at 3 sites on the island in mid to late July (since 1993); we cumulate at least 500 trap-nights at each site annually by trapping over periods ranging from 3 to 10 days. (2) Capture-mark-recapture by live trapping animals using Longworth traps on three 7 to 11 ha grids (100 to 144 traps/grid) in wetland (1 grid) and mesic (2 grids) habitats since 2004. Trapping sessions last for 3 consecutive days (4 or 5 days in 2004 to 2007) and are repeated three times (4 times in 2005 to 2007) during the summer from mid-June to mid-August. In 2015, we added three 7 ha grids (96 to 100 traps/grid) in mixed habitats in 3 additional sites where trapping is conducted during one trapping session. The species, age, sex and reproductive condition of all captured animals is also determined. One of the live-trapping grids in mesic habitat was subjected to various experimental manipulations. From 2007 to 2011, snow fences were used to enhance snow depths in order to determine its effect on lemming abundance and distribution. Snow fences (1.3 m high) was erected in 6 rows of fencing 270 m long each and perpendicular to the prevailing wind (spacing varies between 30 and 50 m, with greater spacing toward prevailing wind). Since 2012, the grid used for the snow fencing experiment is now used for a predator control experiment. All terrestrial and avian predators (except ermine) are excluded by a 1.3 to 2-m high fence made of chicken wire surrounding the grid and covered by criss-crossing fishing line spaced every 50 cm on top. (3) Survey of lemming winter nests after snow-melt in early July using the line transect method since 2007. Each transect is permanent (since 2009), is 500 m long and randomly located within each habitat. A total of 60 line transects is surveyed in wetlands, mesic tundra and streams in mesic tundra (20 transects/habitat). In 2007 and 2008, number of transects were 75 (25 per habitat) and 30 (10 per habitat), respectively. The exact position of each nest found along the transect is noted. In addition, each spring, all winter nests are systematically counted on our live trapping grids by walking parallel lines 5 m apart. Winter nests found opportunistically are also collected in years of low lemming abundance. All winter nests are dissected to determine the lemming species using the nest, reproductive activity (based on pellet size) and signs of predation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Polar Data NetworkFrench-language works237,207