MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Oikonomopoulos, Charalampos (2020). <i>Vallianos Brothers, the benefactors</i>.

2024· article· en· W6977714974 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary and Historical Greek Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)National libraryOrder (exchange)Period (music)Social life

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnates and national benefactors Vallianos brothers financed the construction of the Greek National Library building all by themselves at the end of 19th century. They were succesful Sea of Azov region based merchants.This study is written entirely in Greek. It combines research and analysis of primary and bibliographic sources and follows the "three dimensions (time, place, manner) method", originally developed by the supervising professor, Matoula Sideri-Tomara, who also taught at the Panteion University course about Greek national benefactors.The aim of the study was to correlate decisions of the Vallianos brothers with their unique role as wealthy national benefactors within the turbulent and special historical circumstances of the last quarter of the nineteenth century, in order to analyse and highlight the complex and idiosyncratic political, social and cultural role of that era's magnates, who were isnpired by both Enlightment and Romanticism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1340.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it