MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981341250

ECOHYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF BEAVER DAMS

2023· dissertation· en· W6981341250 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaverHydrology (agriculture)BiotaRiparian zoneEcohydrologyStreamflowFlood mythFloodplainRange (aeronautics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beavers (Castor canadensis and C. fiber) are expanding in their native range in North America and Eurasia and are expanding their range into urban environments and the Arctic tundra. Outside their natural range, they are also in Southern Patagonia because of historic releases in the fur industry. Given the broad geographical span of this expansion, it is critical to understand and predict the hydrology of beaver-dominated landscapes. Beavers build dams that modify the water balance and modulate streamflow through different flow states, which might result in drought and flood mitigation. To date, four published hydrological models have been developed to predict these impacts; however, these models were unable to represent dam variability and dynamics. In this study, a model specific to beaver dams was developed to predict the impacts of beaver dams on hydrology by including the flow state dynamics and the heterogeneity of dams and ponds. First, through the instrumentation of the montane peatland of Sibbald Fen in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, I determined that flow state changes of beaver dams are dynamic on a much shorter scale than previously documented. The shifts from one flow state to another happen regularly, have limited synchronicity within dam sequences, and can be predicted. In Sibbald, 66% to 80% of the flow state changes coincided with rainfall-runoff triggers and no changes were associated with biota using the dams. Following this flow state dynamic, I then developed an open-source model called BeaverPy in Python to simulate key features of dams and their impact on hydrology. Five single flow states and mixed combinations were included to identify their dynamics using a vector-based modeling approach, which accounted for changes in dam structures. Simulating individual and in-sequence dams from Sibbald Fen demonstrated that BeaverPy successfully models streamflow modulation by beaver dams, water storage in ponds, and flow state changes. Metrics for simulated vs. measured behavior for streamflow showed a good agreement in root mean squared error (g in beaver-dominated environments, thereby enhancing the understanding of how to incorporate beaver dams into flood mitigation and stream restoration projects and climate change initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it