MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982530285

Inuit Cribbage Board

2020· article· en· W6982530285 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Kenyon (Kenyon College) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComputational and Text Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTSG101Circumstantial evidencePopulationRidiculousDingo
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This ivory cribbage board is most likely from the Bering Strait area of Alaska, originating from the Inuit culture. While ivory carving of walrus tusks or whale bones has been prevalent for hundreds of years, cribbage boards and other European subjects became popular during the Klondike Gold Rush in Alaska in 1869–99 (Fay, 2019). Ivory artifacts in the Old Bering Strait area have spanned from 100–1500, carrying many different meanings, whether religious or depicting scenes of everyday life (Fitzhugh et al., 2009: 18). These include scenes of daily tasks, as well as icons of sacred connections such as human faces and animal spirits of the sky and sea (Fitzhugh et al., 2009: 18). However, as European whalers and traders came into contact with the local Inuit populations in the late 19th to early 20th century, the old craft of ivory carving took on new forms and meanings in order to cater to the tastes of Westerners (Fair et al., 2006: 35). Customers included whalers, prospectors, missionary teachers, and collectors (Fair et al., 2006: 35). “Market art” took the form of traditional Inuit ivory carving and engraving and translated it to European subjects such as pipes, model ships, engravings on whole tusks, cribbage boards and nonfunctional copies of European objects such as knives and razors (Fair et al., 2006: 35). Inuit culture has been based in a trade reliant economic system before the arrival of Europeans. These incoming merchants from Canada and the United States brought new goods and a cash-based market with them (Fair et al., 2006: 35). Missionaries in the area promoted stable, cash-flowing occupations to the indigenous community, which included ivory carving for tourists and travelers (Fair et al., 2006: 35). Many older implements of traditional Inuit ivory carving survived through family heirlooms, such as bow drills and toolboxes (Fair et al., 2006: 35). Nome, specifically, became a hub for “market art”, and in 1945 ivory carving was even considered a full-time job (Fair et al., 2006: 35). Cribbage is a game that was invented in the early 17th century in England, based on the card game noddy. The game includes a board (like the one we see here), pegs, and a deck of cards, and is usually played with 2-3 people. Our cribbage board at the BHSC is most likely one of these cribbage boards made in traditional Inuit styles and carved in walrus tusk, a combination of Inuit artistic styles and a European board game. These boards would have likely been marketed towards and sold to various Europeans traveling and settling in the Bering Strait area of Alaska in the 20th century (Ray, 1969: 23). Ivory carving is a long-standing tradition within Inuit culture, spanning hundreds of years. Carving is usually done by men; tools for carving include adzes, hacksaws, metal files, small knives, sandpaper, and metal polish (Fitzhugh et al., 2009: 78). Walrus ivory carving dominates the Bering Strait islands, who rely on a seasonal abundance of walrus for food and ivory (Fair et al., 2006: 31). Ivory is highly valued due to its durability, yet it has high plasticity that allows it to be worked and carved (Fair et al., 2006: 34). There are several indications that the cribbage board at the BHSC is made of walrus ivory. The most significant of these is the pattern and color of the ivory as it is carved into deeper sections of the tusk. Walrus ivory is composed of three main layers: an outer enamel followed by a solid white layer, and a yellow, mottled pattern at its core (Fair et al., 2006: 34). This mottled inner core can be seen on the top half of the seal’s tail, facing upwards, and on the sides of the face. As described by the records of David Harris, the drilled hole across the tail could be used for stringing. Seal hunting with harpoons was also very common (Fair et al., 2006: 32). Hunters would wait on ice sheets next to the small holes where seals would surface for air, then, drive the harpoon towards the seal through the breathing hole (Fair et al., 2006: 32). This is most likely the inspiration behind the seal body shaped board. On the reverse of the board, we see scenes of everyday life of the Inuit. Scenes of the every day were very common on ivory carvings, such as fish drying on racks, cooking, or sealskins being pegged to the ground to dry (Fair et al., 2006: 33). The reverse of the seal cribbage board reveals two large tents or dwellings alongside a rack of drying fish or skins. Fortunately, David Harris kept the receipt for this cribbage board in his records. He bought this “Fossil Ivory Scrimshaw Cribbage Board ca. 1840” on February 19, 1993, from Micheal E. Bernholz Antiques in Chapel Hill, NC. The receipt states that the board was from the estate of Admiral Burton Hanson Jr. (1907-1959). Admiral Hanson’s military history reveals a lot about his life, and where he may have acquired this board before selling it to Micheal Bernholz. His father, Burton Hanson (1851- 1922), was director of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad. He graduated from the Naval Academy in 1930, where he later became a Captain and then an Admiral in the US Navy. He married Margaret Fair Gillen, from Milwaukee, and they had one daughter, Elizabeth Fair Hanson, who was a Lieutenant in the Navy (1932-2013). Admiral Hanson is now buried in Arlington National Cemetery alongside his wife and daughter. It is unclear when Admiral Hanson would have sold this board to Micheal E. Bernholz Antiques, or whether it was sold after his death. The date that appears on the handwritten receipt states that the cribbage board is from 1840; however, that is likely incorrect. Cribbage boards weren’t being produced in the Bering Strait area until post-1890, around the time of the Klondike Gold Rush in Alaska (1896-1899). Therefore, it is unclear how this cribbage board ended up in North Carolina, but it seems likely that it was bought post-1890, ended up in the estate of Admiral Burton S. Hanson Jr, was eventually sold to Micheal E. Bernholz Antiques, and finally to Kenyon alum David P. Harris in 1993. Harris’s collection was then donated to Kenyon’s Art History Department in 2020. Some comparable walrus ivory cribbage boards from Alaska: Iñupiaq cribbage board, 1900, 57 x 4 x 2.5 cm, walrus ivory tusk, National Museum of the American Indian 5/4277 Walrus Ivory Cribbage Board, 1905, walrus ivory tusk, Nome, Alaska, Maxwell Museum of Anthropology 89.5.10 Ivory cribbage board with scrimshaw designs, 1800s, walrus ivory tusk, Alaska, Gilcrease Museum 83.1217 Sources Consulted Auger, Emily E. 2005. The Way of Inuit Art: Aesthetics and History in and beyond the Arctic. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland. Bailey, Alfred M., and Russell W. Hendee. 1926. “Notes on the Mammals of Northwestern Alaska.” Journal of Mammalogy 7, no. 1: 9–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373588. Fair, Susan W., and Jean Blodgett. 2006. Alaska Native Art: Tradition, Innovation, Continuity. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska Press. Fay, Amelia. 2019. “Cribbage Board.” Canada History. https://www.canadashistory.ca/explore/fur-trade/cribbage-board. Fitzhugh, William W., Julia J. Hollowell, Aron Crowell, and Robert E. Ackerman. 2009. Gifts from the Ancestors: Ancient Ivories of Bering Strait. Princeton: Princeton University Art Museum. Imperato, Eleanor M. 2017. Carving Life: Walrus Ivory Carvings from the Bering Sea. Bayside, New York; Manhasset, NY: QCC Art Gallery Press. Ray, Dorothy Jean. 1969. Graphic arts of the Alaskan Eskimo, vol. 4. Washington, D.C.: Indian Arts and Crafts Board, US Department of the Interior. By Lana Stone '26

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it