MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982863106

Korrektur Mehrjahres Meereis Konzentration Schätzungen Mikrowelle Satelliten-Beobachtungen mit der Lufttemperatur , Meereis Drift und dynamische Verbindungspunkte

2016· dissertation· en· W6982863106 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMedia (https://www.suub.uni-bremen.de/) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatelliteBrightness temperatureSea iceMicrowaveBrightnessArcticThe arcticSea ice concentration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic sea ice cover is a sensitive climate indicator. Due to the warming climate, it has decreased dramatically in the Arctic over the past three decades. Moreover, multiyear ice (MYI), ice which has survived at least one summer, is decreasing at a much higher rate. MYI concentration can be retrieved from microwave remote sensing data. However, the retrieval shows flaws under specific weather conditions. The current thesis is motivated by the need of better estimates of MYI distribution. It introduces three methods to improve/correct the MYI concentration estimates from microwave satellite observations. The first method builds upon the NASA Team algorithm and uses dynamic tie points to compensate the temporal variations of tie points (typical brightness temperatures of each surface type at all the channels). The MYI retrievals in winters (Oct-May) of the years 1989-2012 show that the method with dynamic tie points yields higher estimates than the original method in most years. Both methods show clear declining trends of the MYI area from 1989 to 2012, which is consistent with the sea ice extent minimum. The MYI concentration retrieval with the NASA Team algorithm is most sensitive to the tie points of MYI and FYI at 19 GHz vertical polarized channel. These tie points should be treated with more caution when dynamic tie points are used. The second and third methods are two correction schemes used to account for radiometric anomalies that trigger the erroneous MYI concentration retrievals from microwave satellite observations. The correction based on air temperature is introduced to restore the underestimated MYI concentration under warm conditions. It utilizes the fact that the warm spell in autumn lasts for a few days and replaces the erroneous MYI concentrations with interpolated ones. It is applied to MYI retrievals from the Environment Canada Ice Concentration Extractor (ECICE) using inputs from QuikSCAT and AMSR-E data, acquired over the Arctic in a series of autumn seasons (Sep-Dec) from 2003 to 2008. The correction works well by identifying and correcting the anomalous MYI concentrations. For September of the six years, it introduces over 1.0x105 km2 MYI area, except for 2005. The correction based on ice drift is designed to correct the overestimated MYI concentrations that are impacted by factors such ice deformation, snow wetness and metamorphism. It utilizes ice drift records to constrain the MYI changes within a predicted contour and uses two thresholds of passive microwave radiometric parameters to account for snow wetness and metamorphism. It is applied to the MYI concentration retrievals from ECICE in winters (Oct-May) from 2002 to 2009. Qualitative comparison with Radarsat-1 SAR images and quantitative comparison against results from previous studies show that the correction works well by removing the anomalous high MYI concentrations. On average, the correction reduces 5.2x105 km2 of the estimated MYI area in Arctic except for the April-May time frame, when the reduction is larger as the warmer weather prompts the condition of the anomalous snow radiometric signatures. Both corrections can be used as post-processings to all the microwave-based MYI concentration retrieval algorithms. Due to the regional effect of weather conditions, they could be important in the operational applications. In addition, both corrections take the spatial and temporal continuity of MYI into account, which gives a new insight that instantaneous observations alone of sea ice may lead to ambiguities in determination of partial ice concentrations. This approach may be applicable to the retrieval of other sea ice parameters as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedia (https://www.suub.uni-bremen.de/)Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207