MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983239842

Machine Learning in Large and Small Earthquakes: from Rapid Large Earthquake Characterization to Slow Fault Zone Processes

2023· other· en· W6983239842 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars' Bank (University of Oregon) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal Plant Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarthquake ruptureRemotely triggered earthquakesMagnitude (astronomy)Ground motionEarthquake predictionSubductionEarthquake simulationInduced seismicitySlip (aerodynamics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation summarizes the work of integrating machine-learning and traditional seismic analysis techniques into large and small earthquake problems. Earthquake early warning for large magnitude earthquakes is one of the most challenging problems in seismology. Here I develop an algorithm, called M-LARGE, that harnesses machine-learning, rupture simulations, and GNSS data to rapidly predict magnitude without saturation issue with an accuracy of 99%, outperforming other similar methods. I then show how M-LARGE can predict finite fault parameters and their evolution when rupture unfolds for fast and accurate ground motion forecasting.This dissertation will demonstrate how machine-learning can be used as a data mining tool to detect small magnitude seismicity buried in noisy waveforms. I will show its application to detect LFEs, a special class of small earthquakes typically occur down-dip of the seismogenic zone. The model detects more than five times the number of events than the original catalog in Vancouver Island and can apply to unseen stations, which provides a more flexible way to refine the temporal resolution of subduction zone processes.\nFinally, I will show how do small and slow earthquakes link to large and fast events and their implication on earthquake hazard assessment. With jointly inverted GNSS, strong motion, and tsunami data of the 2018 M7.1 Hawaii earthquake, I find that fast slip ruptures into the area previously hosts slow slip. The result is further validated by rupture simulations, where we find that the effective stress can be a factor that exerts a dominant control on the rupture extent. This reinforces the idea that an individual section of fault can host a variety of distinct slip behaviors, and slow slip should be considered as rupture extent for a more accurate hazard assessment.\nThis dissertation includes previously published and unpublished co-authored material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars' Bank (University of Oregon)Same topicMedicinal Plant StudiesFrench-language works237,207