MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983668272

Neural Network-based Fault Diagnosis of Satellites Formation Flight

2013· dissertation· en· W6983668272 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsArtificial neural networkFault (geology)Control theory (sociology)Reaction wheelPerceptronFault detection and isolationSatelliteActuator
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this thesis is to develop a methodology for detecting and isolating faults (i.e. fault diagnosis) in any of multiple reaction wheels that are commonly employed as actuators in a consensus-based virtual structure controlled formation of satellites. In order to accomplish this objective, a two-level fault diagnosis system is developed based on Dynamic Neural Networks (DNNs). In the lower-level of the formation flight system hierarchy, a local fault diagnosis module is available in each individual satellite. In this level, the fault diagnosis system may consist of a dynamic neural network that is trained by using absolute measurements and states of each
\nsingle satellite. Unfortunately, a local fault diagnosis system may fail to detect the presence of low severity faults. In an individual satellite these low severity faults
\nmay not cause any serious complications with the specifications of the overall mission, however they can cause significant impact on the satellite’s attitude or rates in a given precision formation flight of a network of satellites. Consequently, in order to detect these low severity faults a fault detection system is required to be designed and developed at the higher-level or the formation-level of the mission hierarchy. Towards this end, the highly nonlinear dynamics of the formation flight and the reaction
\nwheels are modeled by using dynamic multilayer perceptron neural networks. The proposed formation-level DNNs invoke the extended back propagation learning algorithm and are trained based on sets of input/output data that are collected from the relative attitude determination sensors of the 3-axis attitude control subsystems of the satellites. The DNN parameters are adjusted to minimize certain performance indices (representing the output estimation errors).
\nThe capabilities of the proposed DNNs are investigated under various faulty situations, including single and multiple actuator fault scenarios and under high severity and low severity faulty situations. Using a Confusion Matrix evaluation method, it is demonstrated that by using the proposed fault detection and isolation (FDI) scheme, one can achieve a high level of accuracy and precision in detecting faults. The proposed formation-level FDI system has capabilities in efficiently detecting and isolating
\nactuator low severity faults simultaneously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it