Quantifying the impact of insect predators and parasitoids on populations of the apple ermine moth, Yponomeuta malinellus (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), in Europe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Life tables were developed to assess the significance of natural enemies on the dynamics of apple ermine moth, Yponomeuta malinellus Zeller, in southwestern Germany and to select parasitoid species for use in the biological control of this pest in Canada. During the study from 1993 to 1995 the abundance of Y. malinellus varied from 1.5 to 4.3 tents per 100 leaf clusters indicating that this was a non-outbreak population. From the life tables it was evident that the impact of egg predators accounted for 25-43% of the total generational mortality of Y. malinellus, more than any other known mortality factor. Percent parasitism varied from 18 to 30%, but the impact of parasitoids in relation to the total generational mortality of Y. malinellus from the life tables was remarkably constant at 11-14%. The loss of potential fecundity had an important influence on the generational mortality of Y. malinellus, but declined from 27% to 15% over the course of this study. This decline corresponded with a rise in the net rate of increase R0 from 1.35 in 1993 to 6.8 in 1995, despite the impact of insect predators and parasitoids on the generational mortality. Yponomeuta malinellus was attacked by five different obligate primary parasitoids, a single obligate hyperparasitoid, and three facultative hyperparasitoids. Of these, the oligophagous egg-larval parasitoid Ageniaspis fuscicollis Dalman (Encyrtidae) and the oligophagous larval-pupal and pupal parasitoid Herpestomus brunnicornis Gravenhorst (Ichneumonidae) were selected as potential biological control agents for Canada due to a minimal degree of interspecific competition
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".