MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986839094

A reflection on three organ works by Jacobus Kloppers, published as part of SAKOV’s Erediensmusiek Series (2010 and 2013)

2021· article· en· W6986839094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBoloka Institutional Repository (North-west University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformed Theology and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorshipMusicalReflection (computer programming)Function (biology)Interpretation (philosophy)Liturgy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Though the composer, organist, pedagogue, and scholar Jacobus Kloppers left South Africa during the 1970s with his family to relocate to Edmonton, Canada, he actively contributed to advancing Reformed liturgical music in South Africa over the past decades. As an honorary member of the Suider-Afrikaanse Kerk- en Konsertorrelistevereniging (The Southern African Church and Concert Organist Society or SACOS), he has published in Vir die Musiekleier/To the Director of Music, while a few of his liturgical compositions for organ form part of SAKOV’s Erediensmusiek (Worship Music) project. In this article, three of these compositions are \ndiscussed, namely the Toccata on Genevan Psalm 84 (1974), “Hark, the Herald Angels Sing” (1:Scherzando), and “Joy to the world”, the latter two works forming part of Kloppers’s Four Christmas Carol Settings (1985-87). Our choice of works is based on the different stylistic and expressive aspects of each of these works and how they may function within Reformed liturgy. Our discussion proceeds from Christiaan Carstens’s (1995) annotations comprised in his master’s dissertation on Kloppers’s organ works and then elucidates distinct stylistic aspects of the works. Finally, we briefly consider their liturgical functioning. While Kloppers’s organ compositions studied \nin this article illustrate different religious and musical origins and traditions, in terms of their potential for liturgical functionality, they serve the purpose of musical “sermons”. As aesthetic, religious expressions, they eloquently contribute to the domain of non-verbal liturgical meaning-making. In that sense, each idiom Discussed does not merely represent a specific compositional practice, traceable to Kloppers’s religious roots and the various compositional and worship traditions to which he was exposed throughout his life but may also act as the transporter of ritual expectations and material, spiritual experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoloka Institutional Repository (North-west University)Same topicReformed Theology and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207