MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986839094

A reflection on three organ works by Jacobus Kloppers, published as part of SAKOV’s Erediensmusiek Series (2010 and 2013)

2021· article· en· W6986839094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBoloka Institutional Repository (North-west University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformed Theology and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorshipMusicalReflection (computer programming)Function (biology)Interpretation (philosophy)Liturgy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Though the composer, organist, pedagogue, and scholar Jacobus Kloppers left South Africa during the 1970s with his family to relocate to Edmonton, Canada, he actively contributed to advancing Reformed liturgical music in South Africa over the past decades. As an honorary member of the Suider-Afrikaanse Kerk- en Konsertorrelistevereniging (The Southern African Church and Concert Organist Society or SACOS), he has published in Vir die Musiekleier/To the Director of Music, while a few of his liturgical compositions for organ form part of SAKOV’s Erediensmusiek (Worship Music) project. In this article, three of these compositions are
\ndiscussed, namely the Toccata on Genevan Psalm 84 (1974), “Hark, the Herald Angels Sing” (1:Scherzando), and “Joy to the world”, the latter two works forming part of Kloppers’s Four Christmas Carol Settings (1985-87). Our choice of works is based on the different stylistic and expressive aspects of each of these works and how they may function within Reformed liturgy. Our discussion proceeds from Christiaan Carstens’s (1995) annotations comprised in his master’s dissertation on Kloppers’s organ works and then elucidates distinct stylistic aspects of the works. Finally, we briefly consider their liturgical functioning. While Kloppers’s organ compositions studied
\nin this article illustrate different religious and musical origins and traditions, in terms of their potential for liturgical functionality, they serve the purpose of musical “sermons”. As aesthetic, religious expressions, they eloquently contribute to the domain of non-verbal liturgical meaning-making. In that sense, each idiom Discussed does not merely represent a specific compositional practice, traceable to Kloppers’s religious roots and the various compositional and worship traditions to which he was exposed throughout his life but may also act as the transporter of ritual expectations and material, spiritual experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it