MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991241115

The forward facing flaneur: a fresh look at information seeking for the beer festival attendee

2019· other· en· W6991241115 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Output (Edinburgh Napier University) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningPhenomenonPoliticsScope (computer science)State (computer science)Cultural phenomenon
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dӧrk, Carpendale and Williamson (2011) review the Flaneur (Baudelaire, 1863) in contemporary settings, positing the information flanuer as representing a new way of thinking about information seeking. We adapt and extend this and consider the future scope of the flaneur – embedded but not entombed as the leisurely and vigilant urban stroller (Wrigley, 2014), suggesting how the flaneur has evolved in correspondence with new environments becoming a more critical device than its origin as a cultural spectator. Technology is a particular, but not a sole, factor contributing to contemporary environments where the enshrining of turbulence and potential for transformation is simultaneously creating wariness and uncertainty. This produces forward facing reflections, i.e. visions, as the spirit of Baudelaire’s loafer becomes something that is more symbiotic and cognisant of the dangers around him/her in our socio-economic turbulent time (Devine & Devine, 2012; Getz, Andersson, & Larson, 2006; Larson, Getz, & Pastras, 2015; Van Niekerk & Pizam, 2015). Chalcraft and Magaudda (2013) explain how festivals offer occasion for values, cultures, aesthetics and politics to come together. They opine that these festival-related interactions can impact positively outside of the festival as transformation. The beer festival in its many guises as a leisure phenomenon is, as other festivals, both significant and signifier in the unsettled state society currently sits (Robertson, Hutton & Brown, 2018). In this paper we give projections of the transformative capacity of beer festivals. First, we review global and national drivers of change, and discuss signposts and signals that may determine what the Beer Festival looks like in the future. Second, based on the identification of drivers, signposts and signals we critically evaluate the transformative capacities that beer festivals may have.This exploratory work is the basis of a large study in which two communities, in England and in Scotland, envision their own futures through the prism of existing beer festivals. The research adds to a body of knowledge that has grown with the Flaneur, the social significance of festival activity, and the attributes of visioning futures to aid resilience in volatile social-economic times. The application of a future scoping process, identifying drivers, signposts and signals are forwarded are valuable tools in this process. ReferencesBaudelaire, C. (1863) The painter of modern life. Trans. Jonathon Mayne (1964) London: Phaidon.Chalcraft, J., & Magaudda, P. (2013). ‘Space is the Place’: The Global Localities of the Sònar and WOMAD Music Festivals. In G. Delanty, L. Giorgi, & M. Sassatelli (Eds.), Festivals and the Cultural Public Sphere (pp. 173-189). New York: Routledge.Dörk, M., Carpendale, S., & Williamson, C. (2011). The information flaneur: A fresh look at information seeking. CHI Conference ‘Human factors in computing systems’ (May 7-12, 2011), Vancouver, Canada. (ACM 978-1-4503-0267-8/11/05)Devine, A., & Devine, F. (2012). The challenge and opportunities for an event organiser during an economic recession. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 3(2), 122-136.Getz, D., Andersson, T., & Larson, M. (2006). Festival stakeholder roles: Concepts and case studies. Event Management, 10(2-3), 103-122.Larson, M., Getz, D., & Pastras, P. (2015). The legitimacy of festivals and their stakeholders: concepts and propositions. Event Management, 19(2), 159-174.Robertson, M., Hutton, A., & Brown, S. (2018). Event Design in Outdoor Music Festival Audience Behavior (A Critical Transformative Research Note). Event Management, 22(6), 1073-1081.Van Niekerk, M., & Pizam, A. (2015). How do terrorism and tourism co-exist in turbulent times? Introduction to a conflicing relationship. In K. Glaser (Ed.), Terrorism and the Economy : Impacts on the Capital Market and the Global Tourism Industry (pp. 109-125). The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Wrigley, R (2014). Introduction in The Flaneur abroad: historical and international perspectives, (R Wrigley, Ed), Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars Publishing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it