MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992594759

Low-Rank Plus Sparse Decompositions of Large-Scale Matrices via Semidefinite Optimization

2023· dissertation· en· W6992594759 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTridiagonal matrixSymmetric matrixBounded functionPositive-definite matrixSemidefinite programmingMatrix (chemical analysis)Relaxation (psychology)Coefficient matrixMatrix decomposition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the problem of decomposing a symmetric matrix into the sum of a low-rank symmetric positive semidefinite matrix and a tridiagonal matrix, and a relaxation which looks for symmetric positive semidefinite matrices with small nuclear norms. These problems are generalizations of \nthe problem of decomposing a symmetric matrix into a low-rank symmetric positive semidefinite \nmatrix plus a diagonal matrix and one of its relaxations, the minimum trace factor analysis problem. We also show that for the relaxation of the low-rank plus tridiagonal decomposition problem \nwith regularizations on the tridiagonal matrix, the optimal solution is unique when the nonnegative \nregularizing coefficient is not 2. Then, given such a coefficient λ ∈ R+ \\ {2}, we consider three \nproblems. The first problem is decomposing a matrix into a low-rank symmetric positive semidefi- \nnite matrix and a tridiagonal matrix. The second is to determine the facial structure of E′ \nn, which is \nthe set of correlation matrices whose absolute values of entries right below and above the diagonal \nentries are upper bounded by λ/2. And the third problem is that given strictly positive integers k, n \nwith n > k, and points v1, . . . , vn ∈ Rk, determine if there exists a centered (degenerate) ellipsoid \npassing through all these points exactly such that when the points are projected onto the unit ball \ncorresponding to the ellipsoid, for every i, the cosine value of the angle between the projected ith \nand (i + 1)th points is upper bounded by λ/2 and lower bounded by −λ/2. We then prove that all \nthese three problems are equivalent and when the regularization coefficient λ goes to infinity, we \nshow the equivalence between them and the corresponding properties of the low-rank plus diagonal \ndecomposition problem. \nWe also provide a sufficient condition on a subspace U for us to find a nonempty face of \nE′ \nn defined by U. By the equivalence above, this is also a sufficient condition for the other two \nproblems. \nAfter that, we prove that the low-rank plus tridiagonal problem can be solved in polynomial time when the rank of the positive semidefinite matrix in the decomposition is bounded above by \nan absolute constant. \nIn the end, we consider representing our problem as a conic programming problem and generalizing it to general sparsity patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207