MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6992594759

Low-Rank Plus Sparse Decompositions of Large-Scale Matrices via Semidefinite Optimization

2023· dissertation· en· W6992594759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTridiagonal matrixSymmetric matrixBounded functionPositive-definite matrixSemidefinite programmingMatrix (chemical analysis)Relaxation (psychology)Coefficient matrixMatrix decomposition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the problem of decomposing a symmetric matrix into the sum of a low-rank symmetric positive semidefinite matrix and a tridiagonal matrix, and a relaxation which looks for symmetric positive semidefinite matrices with small nuclear norms. These problems are generalizations of
\nthe problem of decomposing a symmetric matrix into a low-rank symmetric positive semidefinite
\nmatrix plus a diagonal matrix and one of its relaxations, the minimum trace factor analysis problem. We also show that for the relaxation of the low-rank plus tridiagonal decomposition problem
\nwith regularizations on the tridiagonal matrix, the optimal solution is unique when the nonnegative
\nregularizing coefficient is not 2. Then, given such a coefficient λ ∈ R+ \\ {2}, we consider three
\nproblems. The first problem is decomposing a matrix into a low-rank symmetric positive semidefi-
\nnite matrix and a tridiagonal matrix. The second is to determine the facial structure of E′
\nn, which is
\nthe set of correlation matrices whose absolute values of entries right below and above the diagonal
\nentries are upper bounded by λ/2. And the third problem is that given strictly positive integers k, n
\nwith n > k, and points v1, . . . , vn ∈ Rk, determine if there exists a centered (degenerate) ellipsoid
\npassing through all these points exactly such that when the points are projected onto the unit ball
\ncorresponding to the ellipsoid, for every i, the cosine value of the angle between the projected ith
\nand (i + 1)th points is upper bounded by λ/2 and lower bounded by −λ/2. We then prove that all
\nthese three problems are equivalent and when the regularization coefficient λ goes to infinity, we
\nshow the equivalence between them and the corresponding properties of the low-rank plus diagonal
\ndecomposition problem.
\nWe also provide a sufficient condition on a subspace U for us to find a nonempty face of
\nE′
\nn defined by U. By the equivalence above, this is also a sufficient condition for the other two
\nproblems.
\nAfter that, we prove that the low-rank plus tridiagonal problem can be solved in polynomial time when the rank of the positive semidefinite matrix in the decomposition is bounded above by
\nan absolute constant.
\nIn the end, we consider representing our problem as a conic programming problem and generalizing it to general sparsity patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it