MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999099325

CBERS-4 imagery for mapping urban land cover in the Amazon

2023· article· ca· W6999099325 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGlobal Affairs CanadaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsAmazon rainforestAmazonianLand coverGeographic information systemRandom forestCover (algebra)Forest coverSatellite imagery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary method for collecting information about the Earth's surface in recent decades, notably for developing nations, has been remote sensing. Despite this, Amazonian cities lack databases and cartographic publications. Considering Santarém as the study site, this paper proposes to create a classification model for mapping the land cover of an Amazonian city. Using imagery from the CBERS-4A satellite's WPM sensor, we created a classification model that combines the Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) method, data mining strategies, and the Random Forest machine learning algorithm. The results are promising in discerning different intra-urban cover classes, with an overall accuracy level in the validation samples of over 98%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.018
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it