MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000892228

Implementing Team-Based Learning in Physiotherapy Education: Students’ Perceptions and Preferences Compared to the Traditional Lecture

2025· article· en· W7000892228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicProblem and Project Based Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreferenceAccountabilityPerceptionHealth careClinical PracticeTest (biology)Patient satisfactionTeam-based learning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silvia Pérez-Guillén,1 Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren,1 Euson Yeung,2 Pol Serra-Llobet,1 Pilar Pardos-Aguilella,3 Sara Cabanillas-Barea1 1Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; 2Temetry Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Department of Physical Therapy, Toronto, Canada; 3Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, SpainCorrespondence: Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallés, 08195, Spain, Email acarrasco@uic.esIntroduction: Team-Based Learning (TBL) is an educational strategy designed for small groups that can be effectively implemented across various educational levels. The aim of TBL is the development of meaningful learning teams, facilitating student interaction and effective communication in problem-solving. It is hypothesized that the use of TBL demonstrates higher levels of satisfaction, engagement and responsibility regarding the acquisition of knowledge than the traditional method of master class.Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out. Twenty-four university students enrolled in the subject of Clinical Reasoning and Evidence Based Practice of the Physiotherapy Master´s programme during the academic year 2022– 23 were included. Engagement, satisfaction and preferences were collected through the TBL Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI).Results: Twenty-three students were included in the final analysis, with a mean age of 25.29 ± 3.84 years. The results obtained from the TBL-SAI indicated a score of 25.57 on the accountability subscale, 51.04 on the preference for this learning approach subscale, and 32.43 on the overall satisfaction subscale.Conclusion: Students found TBL to be engaging, fostering greater responsibility for both individual and group learning. Compared to traditional lectures, TBL sessions were preferred by students, reflecting a higher level of satisfaction with this collaborative learning approach. Further investigation is warranted to assess long-term knowledge retention and to ensure alignment between TBL activities and intended learning objectives.Keywords: active methodologies, task-based learning, clinical reasoning

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it