MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006262427

Timoteüs, Paulus' ideale medewerker?

2009· dissertation· en· W7006262427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUtrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Law and Migration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJudaismOpenness to experienceJosephusClass (philosophy)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this masterthesis we are searching for an answer to the question: Why did the writer of Acts describe that Paul circumcised Timothy? We look first to patriliniarity and matriliniarity from the time of Ezra until the Mishnah. In Ezra, but also in the Mishnah, you can see matrilinearity. Matrilinearity is introduced to keep the priest and his offspring holy. From the time of the Mishnah traditions until now, matriliniarity is the way to show that the child has the same status as the mother and not of the father (patriliniarity). This is important because the marriage class of a child is dependent on the status of the mother. In the time of the Jubilee and of Philo there was (a growing) openness to matriliniarity. Because of this openness it is possible that Timothy was seen as a Jew by Paul and those around him. In the next part we investigate circumcision. It is necessary for men to be circumcised to be a Jew. Without circumcision someone can be a sympathizer, but the person is still a non-Jew. Josephus and Philo didn‘t emphasize circumcision to non-Jews, but underlined that keeping the Jewish law is important. They understood that circumcision wasn‘t acceptable for non-Jews. In Acts we see the movement from Jerusalem to Rome. When Paul visited a city he went first to the synagogue, but he also went several times to the temple in Jerusalem. It was very important for him to reach the Jews first. After that, when the Jews didn‘t listen, he went to the non-Jews. After the Apostle conference (Acts 15) Paul spreads the apostle‘s decree, which tells the gentile Christians that all they had to do is to abstain from things sacrificed to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual immorality. There is nothing said about circumcision, although it is implied that he still fights the circumcision of non-Jewish Christians. Paul needed a co-worker and Timothy was the best one. He was half Jew and half-Greek. By circumcising him he became the perfect co-worker; he had a link with the Greek people, but also with the Jewish people. Timothy was circumcised to make it possible that he could go with Paul to the synagogue and the temple to bring the gospel. Paul did everything to keep contact with the Jews. In Acts 21:26 you see him doing a Jewish ceremony to reach that goal. \nWhen we look to the letters of Paul, we see in Galatians that Paul is angry about the people that claim that gentile Christians must be circumcised in order to be saved. Paul is \nvery clear: only Jesus Christ can save people. However, when circumcision was needed to become part of the Jewish people or to reach Jewish people he was willing to let it be done. In 1 Corinthians, we see that Paul makes clear that a partner and a child are made holy by his or her believing partner or father/mother. Paul makes clear what is really important: love. Circumcision isn‘t a major point for him; he makes clear that circumcision is nothing. On the other hand he makes clear that he likes to be a Jew for the Jew and a Greek for the Greek. Paul shows that adaptation of the message of Jesus Christ isn‘t possible, but that the adaptation of the messenger is possible! That is the freedom of the gospel by Paul. He can be as a Jew to win the Jews in freedom. In 1 and 2 Timothy we see how Timothy is shown as a good messenger of the gospel. He is the ideal messenger for Paul, and also an example for other Christians that do work in the church.His mother and grandmother are discussed, and their belief is shown to make clear he is standing in a tradition of believers. In Titus we see that only Christ can save people, Jewish things such as genealogies and other things cannot save. The most important thing should be belief in Christ. Finally, I conclude that Paul could contemplate and ultimately go ahead and circumcise Timothy because it didn‘t conflict with his theology and standpoints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUtrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)Same topicEuropean Law and MigrationFrench-language works237,207