MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006702774

Work and Mental Health - An Analysis of Canadian Community Health Survey

2005· dissertation· en· W7006702774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDiverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsMental healthStressorBivariate analysisLogistic regressionPsychological interventionPopulationCovariateRegression analysisVariables
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Workplace mental health is a major concern in Canada. The primary objective of this research is to describe the relationship between work and mental health, paying particular attention to work stressors and further explore moderators and mediators of any relationships, that might be targeted in future intervention strategies. The source of the data is the two cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey conducted by Statistics Canada. All estimates produced from the data were weighted to represent the target Ontario population using the weights provided by Statistics Canada. Estimates of the prevalence of the mental disorders and substance dependence and mean scores of work stressors, according to different groups of workers, were calculated. To examine health care use, we treated consultation with a mental health professional, use of medication-antidepressants and utilization of any resource as dependent variables. Bivariate relationships between mental health disorders and other variables explored the correlates of mental health disorders. Logistic regression was used to examine moderators and mediators of work stressors in relation to mental health disorders by including some socio-demographic variables and behavioral variables as covariates and we also included terms of their interactions with work stressors. Since the level of work stressors varied by occupation and was likely determined in part by occupation, we did not include both variables in regression analyses. Further regressions with health care utilization as the dependent variable were conducted with work stressors and occupation as independent variables and other variables as covariates and in interaction terms for people with mental health disorders. The results of the study suggest that there is strong association between work and mental health problems. The findings regarding work stressors and occupation as predictors of mental health problems suggest that work health and safety practitioners must continue to pay attention to the psychosocial conditions of work. We also explored what factors predicted whether people consulted a mental health professional (CCHSl.l) or whether they used any resource available to deal with their problem (CCHS1.2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it