MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010550603

The Impact of World War II on Occupational Opportunity and Choice

2009· article· en· W7010550603 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)World War IIRationingWork (physics)Occupational scienceSpanish Civil WarFirst world war
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Today’s older adults grew up in an era marked, perhaps defined, by World War II. People’s occupational choices are shaped by the opportunities they have and the agency they exert. War may limit the opportunities or agency available to people and thus influence their occupations. Purpose: How did World War II shape people’s occupational opportunities and agency? Methods: This study was a cross-narrative review of nine occupational biographies. The biographies are of individuals in their 80s and 90s, now living in Canada. These individuals were interviewed (4-8 interviews of 1-2 hours each) about the occupations in which they engaged throughout their lives. Audiotapes of the interviews were transcribed verbatim, then analyzed inductively using holistic content and holistic form approaches. Life course and occupational science theoretical perspectives informed analyses. Each completed biography was approved by the individual. The nine completed biographies were re-analyzed to see whether and how occupational barriers and opportunities were related to the war. Results: Productive occupations were the most blatantly affected. Several young men and women served in the military – either voluntarily or by conscription, and this governed most occupations. Other participants lived under foreign military occupation, which constrained opportunity and freedom of choice regarding many occupations. Even those who remained civilians in Canada were affected. One woman spoke of the opportunity for paid work that arose from the war. The men were at war, so women, even married ones, were hired to work in the factories. Less obvious was the impact of the war on non-work occupations. For example rationing and scarcity forced people to focus additional time and effort on domestic chores like meal preparation, yet new leisure opportunities arose for one girl in the form of entertaining the soldiers at military canteens. Discussion: World War II was a turning point in the lives of all nine individuals. In some instances it offered opportunities for occupational choice, but at times it constrained their agency in selecting occupations. These opportunities and constraints were mediated, to some extent, by the age, sex, nationality, and geographical context of the participants. Implications: World events shape the occupational opportunities of individuals by influencing both opportunity and agency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it