Learning from each other: identifying further needs for older adult programming at four Canadian Mental Health Association regional branches from the perspectives of front line staff
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this project is to review existing programs that are available to the older adult population aged 55 and over with Mental Health issues at four BC Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA) branches, with a focus on service providers‟ perceptions of program opportunities. The selected branches include Vancouver-Fraser (CMHA-VF) branch, North and West Vancouver, Shuswap-Revelstoke, and Kelowna branches. The reason for conducting research on this topic is to determine what types of targeted programming might best support regional older adults with mental health concerns. Data was collected using FluidSurveys, and the survey questions allowed for both qualitative and quantitative data. The questions encouraged participants to share their views as front-line staff who work with clients, and what they determine to be effective programs for older adults versus in their view, and what they believe their agency may be able to benefit from, for future programming. Five thematic categories were developed from participants‟ feedback: stigma, education and outreach, leisure/recreational/social wellness programs, how to access resources and future older adult programming. These themes demonstrate not only the work front-line staff members are currently doing within the agency, but also areas of program development that are identified. A theoretical framework of Erik Erikson‟s life span development perspective, and exploring the various social determinants of health, provides a foundation for understanding why older adults experience social exclusion and are denied the opportunity to gain access to resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it