Stakeholder Engagement in the Steel Industry: The key to unlocking the resources and markets of tomorrow, today
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of developing countries, specifically Brazil, Russia, China and India, is pushing the demand for steel to new heights. This comes at the same time as steel consumption is decreasing in developed markets such as the USA and Canada, emphasizing the importance these new markets are having on the growth of the steel industry. As leaders in the steel industry, both in terms of revenue and output, this is especially important for ArcelorMittal. With a growth strategy that relies heavily on vertical integration, entry into new markets and accessing the resources they contain is essential to the future success of the company. However, these markets and the resources within them are controlled by various stakeholder groups, whose expectations and visions are often conflicting but who can collectively determine whether or not ArcelorMittal's plans go forward. Thus it is imperative that ArcelorMittal proactively engages with these stakeholders and involve them in its decision making processes as this will increase the likelihood of it gaining access to resources and entry to new markets and possibly result in a sustained competitive advantage. Currently, there appears to be a gap in how effective ArcelorMittal's current stakeholder engagement strategies are perceived to be by some stakeholder groups, a perception that whether or not is justified, could jeopardise ArcelorMittal's 'social licence' to operate. After building a business case for stakeholder engagement and then analyzing and discussing this perceived gap and its implications for the company, this study puts forward recommendations that will help ArcelorMittal identify relevant stakeholder issues and then effectively engage on them, recommendations that include: \n-\tDeveloping a system for indentifying internal and external stakeholders, both at a global level and at a local level, and then classify them based on their importance to the company's business strategy\n-\tDevelop global and local stakeholder engagement strategies that emphasize proactive, two-way communication\n-\tEnter into more partnerships with NGOs and Industrial Bodies in an effort to gain insight into current best practices for stakeholder engagement, especially in the mining sector\n-\tUtilise the internet and intranet to develop interactive engagement tools that can also provide customised information for specific stakeholder groups\n-\tDevelop an online resource centre for ArcelorMittal's Corporate Responsibility practitioners that provides relevant materials and tools needed in order to create and implement local stakeholder engagement plans
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it