Subakromial s?k??ma sendromu olan ki?ilerde proprioseptif egzersizlerin etkinli?i ?zerine yap?lan randomize kontroll? bir ?al??ma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ama?: Bu ?al??man?n amac??? subakromial s?k??ma sendromlu hastalarda proprioseptif egzersizlerin eklem hareket a??kl???, a?r?, propriosepsiyon, kas g?c? ve fonksiyonel testler ?zerine etkinli?ini de?erlendirmektir. Materyal Metod: Subakromial s?k??ma sendromu tan?s? alan 61 hasta ?al??maya al?nd?. Hastalar randomize edilerek iki gruba ayr?ld?. Bir gruba (n=30) Transkutan?z Elektriksel Sinir Sitimulasyonu, s?cak paket ve standart egzersiz program?, di?er gruba (n=31) bu tedaviye ek olarak proprioseptif egzersiz program? verildi ve hastalar 12 hafta boyunca izlendi. Hastalar?n omuz eklem hareket a??kl??? (EHA) goniometre ile, istirahat, gece ve hareketle olu?an omuz a?r?s? 0-10 cm'lik vis?el analog skala ile, izometrik kas g?c? ve 0?? ve 10??'de propriosepsiyon ?l??mleri (kinestezi, aktif ve pasif repozisyonlama) izokinetik dinamometre ile fonksiyonel durum Western Ontario Rotator Kaf ?ndeksi, The Society of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation ve Constant skorlamas? (CS) ile de?erlendirildi. Bu de?erlendirmeler tedavi ?ncesi, tedavi sonras? 6. ve 12. haftalarda yap?ld?. Bulgular: Tedavi ?ncesinde her iki grup aras?nda ya?, cinsiyet, meslek, e?itim d?zeyi, semptom s?resi, travma ?yk?s?, omuz magnetik rezonans g?r?nt?leme (MRG) evresi a??s?ndan anlaml? fark yoktu ( p>0.05). Tedavi sonras?nda da her iki grubun ula?t?klar? egzersiz faz?, yap?lan egzersiz say?s?, antienflamatuvar ila? kullan?m? a??s?ndan da anlaml? bir fark saptanmad? ( p>0.05). Her iki grupta da tedavi ile EHA, a?r? de?erlerinde, kas g?c?nde, 0?? eksternal rotasyonda (ER) kinestezi duyusunda ve fonksiyonel testlerde anlaml? d?zelme saptand? (p 0.05). Propriosepsiyon egzersizi almayan grupta, 10?? ER kinestezi, 10?? ER aktif ve pasif repozisyonlama duyular?ndaki de?i?imlerde anlaml? fark saptanmazken, propriosepsiyon egzersizi alan grupta bu ?l??mlerde de anlaml? iyile?me oldu?u g?r?ld? (p Gruplar kar??la?t?r?ld???nda ise tedavi ?ncesinde pasif fleksiyon ve internal rotasyon, gece a?r?s? ve CS de?erleri propriosepsiyon egzersizi alan grupta anlaml? olarak daha k?t? (p 0.05). Tedavi sonunda ise t?m parametrelerde gruplar aras?nda anlaml? bir fark saptanmad?. Ama tedavi ile gruplarda meydana gelen de?i?imler kar??la?t?r?ld???nda propriosepsiyon egzersizi alan grupta pasif fleksiyon, abduksiyon ve internal rotasyon a??lar?nda ve gece a?r?s?ndaki d?zelme anlaml? olarak daha iyi bulunurken (p 0.05). Sonu?: Subakromial s?k??ma sendromu tan?s? alan hastalarda?? konvansiyonel egzersiz ve fizik tedavi program?na propriosepsiyon egzersizlerinin eklenmesinin gece a?r?s?n?n azalmas?nda, abduksiyon, pasif fleksiyon ve internal rotasyon eklem hareket a??kl???nda art??a, farkl? a??larda kinestezi ve repozisyonlama duyusunun geli?mesine ek katk? sa?lad??? bulunmu?tur. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of proprioceptive exercises in the patients suffering from the subacromial impingement syndrome on the range of motion, pain, proprioception, muscle strength and functional tests. Material Method: 61 patients with the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome were involved in the study. The patients were classified into two groups randomly. One group (n=30) was given Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, hot package and standard exercise program and the other group (n=31) was given proprioseptive exercise program in addition to this treatment. Then the patients were followed up for 12 weeks. The shoulder range of motion (ROM) of the patients was evaluated with goniometer ?? the shoulder pain that has occurred due to the relaxation and motion and during the night times with visual analogue scale of 0-10 cm?? the isometric muscle strength and proprioception measurements at 0 and 10 degrees (kinaesthesia, active and passive repositioning) with isokinetic dynamometer and the functional status with Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, The Society of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation and Constant scoring (CS). These evaluations were done at the periods of pre-treatment and post-treatment on the 6th and 12th weeks. Findings: Before treatment, there was no significant difference among both groups from the point of view of age, sex, occupation, education level, symptom duration, trauma history, shoulder magnetic resonance imaging phase (p>0.05). Correlatively any significant difference was not observed after treatment as well in scope of the exercise phase to which each group reached, the number of exercise that were done by each group and using antienflamatuar medicine (p> 0.05). The significant recovery was determined related to ROM, pain values, muscle strength, 0?? external rotation (ER), kinaesthesia sense and functional tests in each group due to treatment (p 0.05). when it was noticed that there was no significant difference in the variances of the senses related to 10?? ER kinaesthesia, 10?? ER active and passive repositioning in the group which was not given the proprioception exercise, it was observed that there was a meaningful recovery in those measurements of the group which was given the proprioseption exercise (p In comparison of the groups, before treatment even if it was determined that the passive flexion and internal rotation and night pain and CS values were found in the group which was given proprioception exercise as worse significant (p 0.05). After treatment, there was no significant difference at any parameter among the groups. However, when variances, which occurred in groups due to treatment, were compared, it was observed that the recovery in the passive flexion, abduction and internal rotation angles and the night pain was better significant in the group that was given the proprioception exercise (p 0.05). Conclusion: It was found that the proprioception exercises to be applied additionally to the conventional exercise and physiotherapy program for the patients with the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome shall reduce the night pain and increase the joint motion gap of abduction, passive flexion and internal rotation as well as providing additional contribution in the development of kinaesthesia and repositioning sense at various angles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it