MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017530995

The application of Islamic Law relating to non-consensual sexual offence: a comparative study

2002· article· en· W7017530995 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAndalas University Repository (Andalas University) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShariaIslamObligationNoticeSodomyJurisdictionCivilizationRedressCommon law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Islam is religion and way of life based on the commandments of Allah (God) contained in the Holy Quran and Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Every believer is under an obligation to fashion his or her entire life in accordance with teachings of Quran and Sunnah. Therefore, the believers have to observe at every step the distinction between what is lawful (halal) and what is unlawful (haram). This highlights the need and importance of acquaintance with the Islamic law (Shariah). Generally speaking, in modern secular system consensual sexual relationship outside marriage are not considered a crime. Such sexual freedom is completely unknown to all the sacred laws. The Jewish, the Christian, and the Islamic laws all forbid, and rather render punishable, all types of sexual relationship outside marriage. The differences between these laws appear in what are considered unlawful and punishable sexual relations, and the punishments prescribed for the prohibited practices. The incidence of sex crimes in the form of indecent assault, rape, sodomy, bestiality adultery, fornication and incest has become too common nowadays. The complexities have enormously increased with the advance of science, civilization and culture. Modern urbanization has brought total disintegration of the society which has led to these serious problems in human life. This article is aimed at studying and examining the past and present law relating to sexual offences under the Islamic law and to compare with the laws at the common law jurisdiction such as in England, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, including Malaysia. Besides, it is the objective of this article to consider the proposals and reforms on those laws based on the fundamental principle of protecting the integrity of the nations and individuals. Lastly, it is also interesting to note that it is important to study the article in order to identify whether the main aim of formulating the law relating to sexual crimes (i.e. to protect especially, the female, young persons, minors and mentally retarded against non-consensual sexual intercourse) is achieved or not at some extent of its implementation. I am confident that the Muslim and non-Muslim legal researchers, legal practitioners, members of the judiciary, law lecturers, policemen and lay men will find this article valuable and useful as it contains a comprehensive analysis of the law relating to sexual offences with special reference to the law of rape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it