Cal Poly Concrete Canoe Team Gearing Up for the Nationals in SLO County
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
June 17-19.As many as 500 students in 22 qualifying teams from universities around the U.S. and Canada will come to San Luis Obispo County to compete.The public is welcome and encouraged to be a part of this exciting event.On Thursday, June 17, everyone is invited to view the competing canoes and to observe aesthetics judging from 12:30 to 3:30 p.m. on the O'Neill Green next to the Business Building on campus.All races will take place Saturday, June 19, at Lopez Lake, about half an hour southeast of Cal Poly.Races are expected to run 8 a.m. to noon and 1 to 3 p.m.An awards banquet will be held from 7 to 9 p.m. that day.The goal of the competition is both to provide students with a practical application of the engineering principles they learn in the classroom, while also challenging their knowledge, creativity and stamina, while showcasing the versatility and durability of concrete as a building material.Throughout the year, teams of civil engineering students logged thousands of hours researching, designing and constructing their concrete canoes in search of the winning combination of creativity, knowledge and teamwork.The competition is academic and athletic, with each team's score being based on engineering design and construction principles used in the creation of the canoe, as well as results from men's, women's and co-ed race events.Scores are divided into four components that are each worth 25 percent of the final tally: a design paper, an oral presentation, the final product and the results of five different races -men's and women's slalom/endurance races and men's, women's and co-ed sprint races.The top three teams will receive scholarships worth $5,000, $2,500 and $1,500.The top five teams will receive a commemorative plaque or trophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it